NAU WATCH: Tri-Lateral/Bi Lateral Issues

NAU Logo

 

TRI-LATERAL ISSUES

RURAL DEVELOPMENT


The Rural Development Tri-lateral Working Group was chaired jointly by the Hon. George Groeneveld, Alberta Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Hon. Maria del Carmen Trejo, Michoacan Secretary of Rural Development.

The Working Group provided information and a slideshow presentation about the meetings held in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, in October 2007 and Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico, in May 2008. Reported accomplishments included a biofuel summit held in New Mexico; a cooperative relationship between Alberta and Jalisco for the development of a food processing pilot facility; a youth agriculture education exchange between Texas and Nuevo Leon; and a Oaxaca mission to New Mexico to further investigate their mobile slaughter unit initiative. In addition, Sec. Trejo reported on Michoacan’s innovative rural development programs to assist its poorest communities.

HARMONIZATION


The Harmonization Tri-lateral Working Group was chaired jointly by the Hon. Director Fermin Montes, Nuevo Leon General Director of the Agriculture and Livestock Development Corporation, Alanna Koch, Deputy Minister, Saskatchewan Agriculture, and the Hon. Gene Hugoson. The Working Group proposed a new structure for identifying issues and actions relating to harmonization. Discussions included reports from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) on harmonization efforts relating to animal diseases and plant pests. In addition, officials from the NAFTA Technical Working Group (TWG) on pesticides reported on its new draft five-year work plan. It was agreed that a letter will be sent to the three national governments urging the reinstatement of the NAFTA TWG on Veterinary Drugs and Feed, based on the model provided by the TWG on pesticides. Continue reading

NAU WATCH: Joint Communique

NAU Logo
Eighteenth Meeting of the Tri-National Agricultural Accord

JOINT COMMUNIQUE
August 16, 2008, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho

Continuing a long-standing province/state relationship among Canada, Mexico and the United States (U.S.), the 18th annual meeting of the Tri-National Agricultural Accord took place in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, August 13-16, 2008. Secretaries, Commissioners, Directors, Ministers and senior government officials from 5 Canadian provinces, 6 Mexican states, and 14 U.S. States worked together to improve understanding and strengthen collaboration among the agricultural sectors of the three NAFTA countries. Continue reading

NAU WATCH: Public Health Mutual Aid Agreement Model

DRAFT – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION


Public Health Law Program

Office of the Chief of Public Health Practice

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In cooperation with

CDC’s Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response

Assisted by a panel of public health and legal experts convened at an international workshop in Chicago, Illinois on August 23-24, 2007

Disclaimer

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE. USE OF ANY PROVISION HEREIN SHOULD BE CONTEMPLATED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL. PROVISIONS MAY NEED TO BE MODIFIED, SUPPLEMENTED, OR REPLACED TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE CITATION TO OR COMPLIANCE WITH RELEVANT LAWS, TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES TO A PARTICULAR AGREEMENT, OR TO OTHERWISE ADDRESS THE NEEDS OR REQUIREMENTS OF A SPECIFIC JURISDICTION.

Introduction

Mutual aid agreements* can be effective tools to assist U.S. state and local governments, Tribes, Canadian provinces, First Nations, and Mexican states in sharing information, data, supplies, resources, equipment, or personnel for the purpose of protecting the public’s health.

Public health officials with an interest in developing mutual aid agreements have frequently approached CDC’s Public Health Law Program to request the creation of “model” agreements. In an effort to be of assistance in that regard, the Public Health Law Program, in cooperation with CDC’s Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response (COTPER), gathered, reviewed, analyzed, condensed, and categorized provisions from numerous and varied mutual aid agreements.

Here is a model of the public health mutual aid agreement that is being used by the players of the North American Union also known as Security and Prosperity Partnership.

NAU Public Health Mutual Aid Agreement Model Continue reading

PROTEST Today! NAU/SPP Aug. 13-16-Couer D’ Alene, Idaho

We have 48 hours until the next official meeting of the supposedly ‘dead’ North American Union meeting. For a concept that is dead it is amazing that delegates from the United States, Mexico, and Canada will be attending the next exciting installment of NAU/SPP meetings. The NAU meetings will be held in Couer D’ Alene, Idaho. Plan to attend to protest the NAU. The feature of this conference will be agriculture. We can expect some action plans that will affect our food supply.
Protesting 101
If you are new to protesting this is what you will need:
  • Sign(s) (as clear and as large as possible);

Tip: If you plan to use signs at a legislative body in the future you may want to consider a waterproof fabric or plastic sign with no wood or projectiles that could be construed as a weapon)

  • Comfortable shoes and dress for the weather;
  • Know your topic-NAU (in case the media would like to speak with you);
  • Bring a friend (or a few)
  • Expect opposition (they can be unfriendly, as with Seattle’s anarchist’s)
  • Law Enforcement has been very gracious to both sides of the issue as long as you respect local permits and city/private boundaries.
  • Bull horn to get your point across
  • Camera
  • Tape recorder/video cam
  • No NAU T- shirt
  • Bring water and food (portable-backpack)
10 Minute Citizen: Can’t attend the the protest in person?
  1. Send a message to your state and DC Representatives and Senators . Sample letters are in the template section on the left sidebar of nonaiswa.org.
  2. Get a written position statement from candidates and incumbents on the NAU.
  3. The NAU also has various working groups whom you could write a letter of opposition.
  4. Boycott companies working in partnership with the NAU.
  5. Write a letter to the Editor of your local paper educating people on the NAU.
Tip: If you need help with any of the above leave a comment and someone will help address your question or attempt to find someone who can assist you.
Protest of the North American Union (SPP) in Couer D’ Alene, Idaho
The Couer D’ Alene Golf and Spa Resort
August 13-16, 2008

On behalf of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), we invite you to attend the 2008 Tri-National Agricultural Accord in the State of Idaho August 13-16, 2008. The Idaho State Department of Agriculture looks forward to hosting you to true western hospitality in the beautiful mountain lake setting of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.


This is the 18th Annual Meeting of the Tri-National Agricultural Accord. The Accord continues to provide opportunities to resolve trade issues among the three NAFTA countries and to build relationships among the various States in Mexico and the United States and the provinces of Canada.


The meeting will take place at the Coeur d’Alene Resort, 115 S. 2nd St, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, 83814. Accord participants traveling by air would fly to Spokane, Washington. Couer d’Alene is about a 40 minute drive from the Spokane Airport.

Consider protesting this by invitation only event and protest presumed regulation and guidelines:

 

This is an invitation-only event for the U.S., Mexican, and Canadian Secretaries, Ministers, Commissioners and Directors of State/Provincial Departments of Agriculture.

NAU WATCH: U.S., Canadian, Mexican ag leaders to meet in Idaho

10 Minute Citizen: Leave a comment opposing agricultural harmonization. This is the same harmonization that has brought contaminated food to your dinner table: Link to Capital Press

Plan to attend the PROTEST? See Protesting 101

Most sessions are closed, but news media and others are invited to certain portions of the meeting. Those include the opening ceremonies, from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Thursday, Aug. 14. Following from 9:45 to 11:45 a.m. Thursday, there will be a report on climate change, the rural development tri-lateral report, the harmonization on tri-lateral report, and a presentation on nutrition by Undersecretary Nancy Montanez Johner, department of food, nutrition and consumer services, USDA.

A tour of Jacklin Seed Co., Post Falls, Idaho, will occupy Thursday afternoon.

No events will be open to the public on Friday, Aug. 15.

Activities on Saturday, Aug. 16, include the closing ceremonies and presentation of communiqué remarks by Celia Gould, director of the Idaho State Department of Agriculture, from 9 to 10 a.m. The ceremonies will end by a signing of the communiqué by the delegation heads from Canada, Mexico and the United States.

NAU WATCH: Energy integration agenda hits speed bump: Mexicans vote in favour of public ownership

 

http://www.canadians.org/integratethis/energy/2008/Aug-08.html

Posted by Andrea Harden

 

In a major rebuke to the Mexican government’s integrationist plans, on July 27th over 80 percent of voters rejected President Calderon’s plans for Mexico’s nationalized energy sector. This vote which brought out large numbers of people is significant. It demonstrates a clear opposition to the market-based energy integration between Mexico, the U.S. and Canada being pursued by the North American Energy Working Group (NAEWG) under the auspices of the secretive Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Key components of NAEWG’s work includes supporting more privatization along with harmonization of regulations (potentially to the detriment of social and environmental priorities) and less public-control, more market (or corporate) control of oil and gas imports and exports.

NAU Watch: Alberta Ag minister to meet with US, Mexican and Canadian colleagues

Alberta Ag minister George Groeneveld will attend the Tri National Accord in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho on August 13 to 16, to promote trade, exchange information, and strengthen the province’s agricultural trade relations.

Groeneveld will meet with Canadian, American and Mexican agriculture policy makers.

“Collaboration, such as the Tri-National Agricultural Accord, is necessary in order to remain competitive in today’s global markets,” said Groeneveld. “By working with our NAFTA partners – Mexico and the US – we will be able to develop unified positions on the issues that are important in North American agriculture.”

Rural development, harmonization, country of origin labeling and nutrition will be among the topics discussed at the 2008 meeting. As the lead province in the Tri-Lateral Rural Development Working Group, Alberta will also report on the progress made since the 2007 Accord.

A series of bi-lateral working group meetings will be held throughout the Accord. Representatives from two of the three NAFTA partners will meet and discuss specific issues related to the unique relationship between their countries. Groeneveld will co-chair the Canada/Mexico bi-lateral group meeting, as well as the Canada/US meeting.

Last year’s Tri-National Accord was held in Monterrey, Mexico. The three member countries rotate hosting duties each year. The event brings together secretaries, commissioners, and ministers from the agricultural sectors of the NAFTA countries.

10 Minute Citizen: Organize or attend a protest opposing the North American Union in your area. Say NO to becoming an occupied territory.

PNWER Action Items 2008

2008 Pacific Northwest Economic Region (PNWER) Action Items

Agriculture

• The Agriculture working group will compile a summary of regional agriculture issues identified during the working group action strategy session and distribute to working group members to prioritize (high, medium and low). The working group will convene a conference call in the fall to discuss the high priority items and develop a strategy for the coming year, including identifying topics and agenda items for the Boise Summit, July 12-16, 2009.

• PNWER will partner with states and provinces to support the development of the 2nd Cross Border Animal Health Conference in Banff in April 2009.

Border Issues

PNWER endorses the below Border Charter. This living document will be updated to reflect current efforts underway and new policies impacting our shared border.

PNWER BORDER CHARTER


Preamble

Canada and the United States of America enjoy a unique relationship based on geographical proximity, historical friendship, shared values, close alliance and family ties. The two countries are major commercial partners whose economies are integrally bound together in the world’s largest bilateral trading relationship. Ease of legitimate cross-border mobility has been vital to the unprecedented economic well being and safety of our citizens for more than a century. The 2010 Olympics are an unparalleled opportunity to leave a positive legacy, creating a new vision for a border that is protective and convenient, secure yet with a light footprint.

The border between Canada and the United States has historically been a model for other international boundaries in defending each nation’s sovereignty and increasing mutual security while promoting frequent and friendly travel and trade. Canada and the United States are working together with Mexico to develop a vision of North America that is safe, prosperous, and globally competitive. North America’s global competitiveness requires borders that work effectively and enable smooth and seamless flows of legitimate trade and travel. This is of particular importance for the Pacific Northwest, a region that is North America’s Gateway to the thriving economies of the Asia Pacific region.

Businesses, professional associations and other stakeholders on both sides of the border have expressed serious concern with the increasing costs and delays associated with crossing the

Canada-U.S. border. More than 7 million jobs in the United States and 3 million jobs in Canada depend on the Canada-U.S. border working well. Communities on either side of the border have a strong interest in ensuring that the border remains open and convenient for legitimate trade and travel, as well as ensuring rapid cross-border mutual assistance in potential emergencies such as natural disasters, epidemics and other public health emergencies, or terrorist attacks.

The rich, intricate web of economic, social and educational exchange is nurtured by partnerships between public and private sectors at the national, regional and local level. U.S. states and Canadian provinces are actively engaged in promoting strong mutual economic, transportation and cultural connections for the prosperity of their residents.

Established at the behest of states and provinces sharing a common geographical and economic space, PNWER has been an indispensable bridge in building cross border cooperation vital to enhancing prosperity and security. It is in this spirit that the PNWER Border Charter is created.

1. Vision

PNWER is committed to ensuring that the border between Canada and the United States will once again become a model for the world for ease, convenience, and economic exchange. This is a vision of the Canada-United States border that will increase both security and prosperity for all our residents.

In support of this vision, PNWER endorses the specific recommendations of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on reducing border costs while strengthening security, put forward in their February 2008 report Finding the Balance: Reducing Border Costs While Strengthening Security.

2. Regional Leadership PNWER hereby establishes a Border Solutions Coordination Council (as called for by Members of Congress and border communities in the Pacific Northwest). The mandate for this forum is to:

• Provide consistent input on regional priorities from governments, stakeholders and border communities in the Pacific Northwest

• Help shape border security policy and implementation strategies

• Connect the federal governments in a systematic way with local impacts of border decisions

Possible members include:

• Ex officio: representatives from PNWER jurisdictions

• Ex officio: Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

• Ex officio: Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA)

• Private sector:

• Canadian American Business Council;

• Council of Tourism Associations of BC (COTA);

• BESTT Coalition;

• Canada-America Border Trade Alliance (Can-Am BTA)

• Regional experts

• Border Policy Research Institute (BPRI) at Western Washington University

• Intervistas

Additional information on shared border priorities will come from continued interaction with the Canada-US Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) and border-gateway planning coalitions such as the International Mobility and Trade Corridor Project (IMTC)

The PNWER Border Solutions Coordination Council will be chaired by the PNWER President and will meet on a semi-annual basis.

The Border Policy Research Institute (BPRI) will serve initially as the Secretariat for the PNWER Border Solutions Coordination Council.

3. Measuring Success

PNWER will clearly articulate these shared border priorities and monitor the activities of the two federal governments, as well as the governments of its member jurisdictions, in ensuring the needs of the region are fully taken into account in the development and implementation of border policies.

The U.S. and Canadian Chambers of Commerce have called on the two federal governments to ‘establish goals and develop metrics to drive agency behaviour and priorities that demonstrate tangible benefits to program participants’ in trusted shipper programs and other frequent border users.

In order to ensure meaningful and consistent follow-up on these goals, PNWER will issue a State of the Border Report Card at its Annual Summit measuring the extent to which governments have acted on the region’s priorities.

4. Call for action

PNWER calls on the federal governments of Canada and the United States to undertake the following actions required for the Pacific Northwest’s priority border management objectives, to be measured and reported in the annual State of the Border Report Card:

Objective 1: Ensure secure, convenient and welcoming border crossing experience for 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games

Measurement: Satisfaction levels among border users on convenience and service.

Possible solutions include:

• Integrated and tested plan for handling peak flow traffic at border crossings:

• Test programs designed to remove some regular regional traffic from the roadways during anticipated periods of peak Games-related activity, e.g. in summer 2009, when the Police Games coincide with the normal seasonal traffic peak and when mobility through the Peace Arch will be impaired

• Ensure that 10 U.S.-entry booths are available at the Peace Arch border crossing for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.

• Super Host customer service workshops and training programs for customs and border officials dealing with Olympic border crossers, such as Tourism British Columbia’s World Host Ambassador Training workshop for delivering customer service during the 2010 Games.

• Pre-clearance program, designated special lanes and information for Olympics border crossers

• An advance-passenger manifest system for charter buses, smoothing passage in both directions through the border

• Dedicated lanes and a pool of booths for U.S. and Canadian citizens who tend to be cleared more rapidly than nationals of other countries

• Provide Olympics ticket purchasers with information package on transportation options, documentation requirements, and online Advanced Traveller Information System (ATIS) website links

Objective 2: Reduce congestion and streamline flows of legitimate trade and travel

Measurement: Median clearance times per traveller.

Possible solutions include:

• Reduced wait and processing times through:

o Increased staffing levels and traffic capacity

o More use of technology for pre-clearance and processing prior to physical arrival at the border

o Streaming traffic requiring additional service (e.g. immigration, vehicle imports, customs fees)

o Implement an online system to streamline declaration of customs and duty payments for tourist travel, reducing delays at primary and secondary inspection spaces

o Baggage by-pass (eliminating duplication in customs and security screening) for air passengers making domestic and international connections across the Canada-US border.

• Better signage directing traffic towards less congested border crossings and lanes

• The existing technology supporting the Cascade Gateway Advance Traveler Information System (ATIS) must be brought back online as soon as possible

•o Expand ATIS to all four Cascade Gateway ports (i.e., adding Lynden, Sumas), for both passenger and commercial traffic. Information would be displayed online, as well as on a larger set of Variable Message Signs (VMS).

• Customs pre-clearance for Amtrak train service between Vancouver and Seattle

• Increased use of truck pre-clearance and electronic seals

o Fund data collection study to investigate e-manifest effectiveness and consider CBSA e-manifest program similar to US CBP program at Pacific Highway crossing

• Improved procedures for frequent business travellers

• Greater clarity and streamlined procedures, including fact sheets that provide clear instructions on how and where to submit applications and forms

• Combined NEXUS and TN-1 Visas for professionals and technical specialists on short-term cross-border work assignments, enabling multiple employment contracts through a pre-registration program

• Ombudsperson to handle business traveler issues and review denials

• Automated remote border processing for corporate jets, using customs resources more effectively and stimulating additional traffic at community airports.

Objective 3: increase outreach and expansion of frequent border crossing programs to improve security by focusing resources on higher-risk traffic.

Measurement: Ratio of resources freed to examine higher-risk goods and people.

Possible solutions include:

• Smooth implementation and expansion of enhanced drivers’ license initiatives

• Identify potential solutions to facilitate faster border crossing for holders of Enhanced Drivers Licences.

• Consideration of EDL as meeting identity document requirements for air travel in North America

• Increased use of Nexus cards through expansion of the bi-national program, designated flexible lanes, and improved value for participants through integration with other low-risk, voluntary travel initiatives

• Develop targeted NEXUS marketing program aimed at frequent border crossers in Surrey and Bellingham who have not yet joined the program

• Increase NEXUS throughout at the Pacific Highway crossing by increasing the hours of staffing and installing signage and lane markings that better help travelers approach the NEXUS booths.

• Continuous communication campaign on document requirements in partnership with tourism industry, border communities and regional organizations.


Energy/Environment

• Track development of national policy in both Canada and US

• PNWER encourages BC to share the Smart-tech program with interested jurisdiction as a best practice

• PNWER encourages member jurisdictions to structure research on CCS to allow and encourage appropriate sharing of information between jurisdictions

• PNWER encourages institutions in the region to collaborate on a GIS mapping of climate change adaptation strategies, specifically examining a potential water vulnerability assessment examining the availability of water resources.

Healthcare/Infrastructure Security

• PNWER endorses the establishment of a Pacific Northwest Border Health Alliance to coordinate health preparedness across the region. This innovative agreement between the PNWER jurisdictions is intended to allow the region to respond to surge capacity demands on health systems and health resources efficiently and in a cost effective manner when public health emergencies arise in any PNWER jurisdiction. The arrangement also allows states-provinces to assess current and explore future areas of operational responsibility that could result in efficiencies when providing health services.

Healthcare

• The PNWER Healthcare working group will work with government and industry partners to prepare a comparative report card on public health statistics and an inventory of healthy public policies across the PNWER region. These findings will be distributed in the PNWER Healthcare Update (newsletter) and posted on the website.

• PNWER will partner with the Institute of Health Economics to develop a forum on telehealth technology involving public sector partners, researchers, and private industry to address barriers to the implementation of new technology options in this area.

• PNWER will explore establishing a Health Evidence Network in the PNWER region beginning with developing an inventory of existing health evidence centers. Working group members will work to reach out to these centers to encourage the sharing of best practices in the comparative effectiveness of health technologies and services.


Innovation
(PNWER should seek funding and project leads for the following)

• Inventory core research competencies of the region’s universities to identify meaningful collaboration opportunities;

• Convene discussions among the region’s universities regarding student exchange and transferability of academic credit;

• Identify current global innovation initiatives of universities, particularly those focused on Asia-Pacific with the intent to develop regional best practices;

• Create an inventory of best practices for institutions to anticipate and meet industry’s demand for individuals to fill roles in the innovation economy.

Explore the creation of an industry-driven investment fund that would support cross-border R&D collaboration

Ocean and River Energy

Subject to funding, PNWER should work with stakeholders to: (no obligation of any jurisdiction to provide staff/resources)

• Assess the velocity and energy potential of freshwater resources in the PNWER region, working with public water officials.

• Bring utility interests together in order to develop a shared knowledge base of challenges facing hydrokinetic development (possible topic of PNWER Winter Meeting)

• Review incentives for local, state, provincial and federal funding on both sides of the border regarding development of the hydrokinetic industry

• Create an understandable and comprehensive checklist of permitting issues.

• Execution of regulatory requirement reviews (as has been proposed to NRCan and DOE).

• Bring together regional experience to indentify the aspects of ocean energy development which fall within the existing experience base and permitting of marine works and operations (i.e. cable laying, interconnections).

• Continue to build the awareness of the need for market mechanism to pull ocean energy to provide energy, economic and environmental opportunity for the PNW

(i.e. resource specific RFP, feed-in tariff).

• Creation of a pacific coast utility alliance with a goal to meet formally this fall – investigate project collaboration opportunities, knowledge sharing mechanisms

• and mechanisms to ensure that project memories are incorporated into a broader sector memory. Investigation of an emerging energy pathway to incorporate ocean energy into acquisition planning along side formal IRP (LTAP) processes.

• Continue to use the Pacific Ocean Energy Network as a means to share information and learning experiences.

Tourism

• PNWER will continue to coordinate the development of a regional media strategy, through a process of collaboration and facilitation, with content creation the responsibility of the member jurisdictions and their partners.

• PNWER will support the further exploration of the Cascadia Commons project through the facilitation of meetings with key stakeholders and potential sponsors.

• PNWER will establish an online collaborative group to support the distribution of Olympic related information from Tourism Vancouver, the Four Host First Nations and other Olympics related organizations to PNWERs member states and provinces.

• PNWER will call together private sector tourism operators and their representatives by fall 2008 on a conference call/meeting, to identify border issues that are affecting international leisure and business travel.

• PNWER will be available to facilitate information exchange on sustainability practices between tourism organizations in the region.

Workforce

• Results and recommended solutions from the PNWER Labour mobility study will be presented to Human Resources and Social Development Canada. As a part of this process PNWER will identify stakeholders to assist with solutions implementation.


Water

• The PNWER Water Working Group will partner with the Water Research Institute in Edmonton to find similarly focused state and provincial water research/policy organizations to begin to collaborate on a regional level. The first step in this process will be to develop an inventory of contacts from regional water organizations and invite these key stakeholders to an initial conference call/coordination meeting in the next 6-9 months. PNWER will also reach out to the Western Governor’s Association and British Columbia to coordinate on current water issues.

Private Sector Representation on PNWER Executive Committee

• One representative shall be selected from each PNWER jurisdiction to represent the private sector on the PNWER Executive Committee

• Appointments shall be for a two year renewable term.

• Appointees shall be expected to have broad general knowledge of and represent the interests of the overall private sector and shall not represent any particular interest group, constituency or position

• Representatives shall be expected to be available for bi-weekly teleconference of the Executive Committee; for periodic teleconferences or meetings of the Private Sector Council; and to attend the Annual Summit and Winter Meeting of PNWER

• Representatives should have the ability to mobilize other private sector participants and generally foster enhanced involvement in and support for PNWER activities

• Representatives will be expected to enjoy the support, both morally and financially, of their employer/organization for their involvement in PNWER at this level.

Pacific Northwest Economic Region (PNWER) 2200 Alaskan Way, Suite 460, Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: 206.443.7723, Fax: 206.4443.7703

www.pnwer.org

NAIS & Y2Y-Regionalization of the West

An Inventory and Assessment

 

The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is one tool that government that applies a fuzzy math algorithm to incrementally sway the public to adopt regionalization and then to accept global domination of the food supply.

 

In Phase I of NAIS, Premises Identification, people get used to the idea of yet another number allocated to their private property. Later that number gets transferred for another purpose. Phase II of the NAIS is the electronic identification of livestock. For most people the image of livestock brings to mind rural landscapes spotted with animals, far from their real world, therefore electronic identification is acceptable to urban populations. Application of the, “It doesn’t affect me,” principle chips away at yet another American freedom. In Phase III of NAIS, tracking & surveillance of animal life from birth to death, manufactured fear of agro-terrorism or food contamination is induced. With these simple three phases of NAIS our state and country sovereignty is erased while regionalization and commerce restriction is embraced.

 

This is an older document which provides the historical background of the Yukon to Yellowstone (Y2Y) Initiative just one of the many incestuous groups or organizations, affiliations, and individuals who are promoting regionalization of the West resulting in creation of other tools such as NAIS for further global control.

Regionalization of the West

 

Who are the collaborating drivers forging global government? Is your state among the following the pack of globalist lemmings? Embedded within this document and its links one will find the big picture with unending rabbit trails.

 

Participating Collaborators in Western Regionalization

 

The upcoming legislative season will see a new push for the Y2Y (Yukon to Yellowstone) project and other regionalization programs such as NAIS that chip away at your right to property ownership and the transference of large parcels of land to global governance.

 

10 Minute Citizen: Look up environmental legislation in your state and contact your Representatives and Senators, federal and state, and say NO to globalization (NAIS and Y2Y).

It’s Time to Protest the NAU!

Calling all Americans, Canadians and Mexicans!

The time to protest the North American Union (NAU-SPP-Deep Integration). The powers that be are a bit nervous that folks are talking about a resistance. Short of time or money? Leave a message in the comment section for the “international sell-out frequent flyers” of this site. The more they hear, see, feel the more they will come to understand that the people are opposed to this scheme and will do what it takes to ensure it fails. People around the world are beginning to hold their governments accountable.

If you will be joining one of the protests leave a message at the end of the post (real names not needed) and we can meet up.

The NAU opposition season begins tomorrow in Springfield, Illinois tomorrow, July 18.

Will you be a 10 minute citizen and do something that opposes your countries sovereignty?