Part II: Traceability- The Dawn of a New Age in Food Control

Part II-Traceability:  Marking the Beasts

By

Celeste Bishop

January 2013 Update.  Last month the final rule for Traceability (the old NAIS) was finalized.  In rule-making it does not matter what the people want the agencies make the rules, people testify, and the agencies do what they want.  With the large public outcry from coast to coast it took the USDA a long time to meet their goals but they are now here for all of us to endure.  Stand your ground.  This month every deceptive trick in the book is coming your way to ensnare you.  Look carefully at fine print, don not answer census’s or surveys, and do not hit any simple one button gimmicks that take you into slavery.

The concept of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) was created in the bowels of international think-tanks for marking global assets.  It was commenced in the United States after the tragic events of 911, although plans for an animal disease outbreak were already being put on the books within emergency management.  Most farmers and ranchers became aware of the NAIS in late 2005, early 2006.  Historically agrarians have sounded the alarm when predators were encroaching and so too they heralded the news that a perilously dangerous time was imminent.

Since ancient times farmers have kept watch over their flocks and knew each animal intimately.The shepherd would know if something was wrong with the animal and would intervene as appropriate.Today there is a universal bureaucracy that has seized identification of animals for its own purposes.They want all premises registered, eliminating your absolute right to private property.Put simply they do not want you to own private property.Once you go through the registration process your land title is clouded and your have just transferred your ownership to a silent partner who calls the shots on what you can and cannot do.In the name of poverty alleviation governments around the world are ˜securing assets, aka animal capital. This is another reason for the increased pressure of multiple census.

Nowadays government wants to use identification of property and animals for certification of exports and to falsely bolster consumer confidence that has taken a hit from increasing food contamination.These same rulers want to increase the pressure, coerce farmers to adopt their brand of livestock production practices that are diametrically opposed to established safe and prosperous agriculture.

In order to achieve their goal, tyrannical powers are seeking to flood the agricultural market with ever-increasing herd and flock health programs and heavy handed controls on breeding and subjective genetic ˜improvement” programs. As traditional agriculture is being purged, the global control of animal movement is taking center stage as can be seen with the USDA’s recent announcement of a Traceability Framework.Simultaneously, zoning and compartmentalization is breaking the backs of sovereign countries and states in the name of controlling disease.Food security is being strongly linked with public health.Public health is being commingled with zoonoses (diseases that effect humans and animals) and food safety. A tightening noose is being put around market access.In the foreseeable future only those who are compliant will be allowed market access.The term animal welfare is being manipulated, exploited, and redefined into international definition and the public is unaware of the subtle and progressive change.

2009 Going Where No Man Has Gone Before

In 2009 the OIE held its first Animal Identification and Traceability Conference (ID &T).The objectives of this international conference simply stressed to participating countries and businesses the ˜benefits of identification and traceability and demands for a global commitment to identification & traceability.This conference served as a vehicle to raise awareness, thus familiarity, of the OIE and Codex standards. Through transparency, a free-flow of information and data from the various countries would be extracted for perfection of the final ONE food system.Technological standards are yet to be determined for future application within the total food control grid.When completed, Animal Identification & Traceability will be a seamless system that prevents gaps and duplication between standards, it will be ONE system for all.

When the USDA presented their new Traceability Framework they stressed, Encourage the use of lower-cost technology. One must carefully listen to what the USDA was saying with this statement and not project many farmer’s hope and desire that the agency was ‘˜listening’ to the people.The USDA is merely mirroring the OIE ID & T Framework of making an even technological playing field so that no countries, including poor ones, would be left behind.Applied research is now being commanded to develop cheaper and more practical tools.The socio-economic circumstances of all participants are scrutinized so ID & T calls for flexibility during implementation to be required.Hence, the USDA, in good conscience states administered by the States and Tribal Nations to provide more flexibility.

It has been determined that your veterinarian is a valuable key to bridging the gap between public and private sectors.He or she is a conduit that assists in collecting, analyzing and disseminating information.It is through the Veterinary Services (VS) that an improved legal ID& T will emerge.

What Does ID & T Guarantee?

ID & T has discovered that fear is a motivating factor in persuading people and countries to change their basic philosophies and law.The media has whipped up a Fear of the Week frenzy.The OIE, never wanting a good crisis to go wasted, is promising the peoples of the world:

What is the OIE’s Scope?

Continue reading

Part I: The Dawning of a New Age of Food Control (5-Part Series)

Part 1: The Great Food Heist

By

Celeste Bishop

All Images from governmental documents and powerpoints

For Educational Purposes Only

February 5, 2010 was the dawn of a new age of food control.  Food freedom in the world as we have known it has died. The sun is emerging with the dawn of a sophisticated control system that neither ourselves nor our fathers have ever known. Behind the facade of ‘safe food’ is a web of deception, intrigue, power, money, and deep spiritual truths.  Are you ready for the most cataclysmic event that the world has ever witnessed?

With winks and handshakes the world’s food supply was taken down and is currently being resurrected by a leviathan monster under the auspices of the Office International des Epizooties (OIE).  The OIE was established in 1924 and reorganized under the new name, the World Organization of Animal Health, in 2003.  The OIE has 177 permanent countries that adhere to its guidelines.  The World Trade Organization (WTO) has ONE mandate, the ‘improvement of animal health and welfare all around the world’.  The organization has published and implemented a series of complex global treaties including the WTO Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary Treaty (WTO SPS) that purports to safeguard world trade. This multilateral framework established the Terrestrial Animal Health Code as a toolkit to dominate all life forms on our planet. The Terrestrial Animal Health Code adopts the Three Sisters under its umbrella.

The Three Sisters

Continue reading

Washington State Senate Introduces Voluntary NAIS

S-1526.1
SENATE BILL 5956

State of Washington 61st Legislature 2009 Regular Session

By Senators Schoesler, Shin, Stevens, Zarelli, Marr, and Benton
Read first time 02/10/09. Referred to Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development.
1 AN ACT Relating to voluntary participation in a state or national 2 animal identification system; and adding a new section to chapter 16.57 3 RCW.

4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

5 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 16.57 RCW 6 to read as follows: 7 (1) Voluntary participation in any state or national animal 8 identification system must be obtained with informed written consent. 9 (2) No officer, agency, or instrumentality of the state, in
10 conjunction with the implementation of any state or national animal 11 identification system, may: 12 (a) Mandate, coerce, use exclusionary tactics, support, or 13 otherwise force participation in a state or national animal 14 identification system; 15 (b) Register real property, assign real property identification 16 numbers, or otherwise enroll any person in a state or national animal 17 identification system without the person’s prior knowledge and written 18 consent;

p.1 SB5956
1 (c) Withhold, from any person, indemnity based on the person’s 2 status of participation in a state or national animal identification 3 system; or 4 (d) Deny, revoke, or limit services, certificates, licenses, 5 permits, grants, or other benefits or incentives to any person based on 6 the person’s status of participation in a state or national animal 7 identification system. 8 (3) Nothing in this section prohibits: 9 (a) The state from establishing or participating in disease control

10 programs specifically designed to address a specific disease in a 11 specific species of livestock; 12 (b) Private agricultural industry organizations from establishing 13 any source verification program; or 14 (c) Any person from voluntarily participating in a state or 15 national animal identification system. 16 (4) For the purposes of this section, “voluntary” means acting or 17 done without compulsion or obligation.
—END –¬
SB5956 p.2

WA Voluntary NAIS Participation Bills are UP! We need your help

Washington State Voluntary NAIS has been introduced:

House and Senate

Six Steps to Farming Freedom

Status Report

Accompanying Documentation

“This is fantastic news,” said one Washington NoNAIS person upon hearing that House Bill (HB) 2086 was read this morning and assigned to the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, and also that Senate Bill (SB) 5956 was read this morning and introduced to the Senate Agricultural and Rural Economic Development Committee at 10:30 this morning.

A team of three hit the Capital last Monday representing three impacted sectors: a Realtor, a livestock auctioneer, and a public relations manager. This team of three also represented the following species: bovine, horses, goats and poultry. With great enthusiasm and support on Friday proposed legislation regarding, “Voluntary participation in the National Animal Identification System”, known as NAIS, went into play in the Senate and the House.

Representative Shelly Short sponsored HB 2086.

Senator Mark Schoesler sponsored SB 5956.

(Please take time to thank these Legislator’s)

Both bills are located on the www.nonaiswa.org website. The proposed legislation language is identical, and is commonly referred to as Companion Bill set.

February 20th is our cutoff date for both HB 2086 and SB 5956. The Agricultural Committee Chairs must decide to hold a public hearing and move HB 2086 and SB 5956 by February 20th or the bill(s) die in committee.

The chairman of the Senate Ag Committee is Senator Brian Hatfield:

Email: hatfield.brian@leg.wa.gov

Phone: (360) 786-7636

The chair of the House Ag Committee is Representative Brian Blake.

Email: blake.brian@leg.wa.gov

Phone: (360) 786-7870

We Need Your Help!

NOW is the time we need your help! The team of three spent the entire last week in Olympia ~ 5 days ~ meeting with our representatives, educating, asking for support, asking for sponsors of these bills.  NOW IT IS UP TO YOU…

Proposed Legislation, HB 2086 & SB 5956 Status

HB 2086 and SB 5956 are new fresh new bills with new prime sponsors and new supporters. It is important to note that HB 2086 is not HB 1151. Due to the tremendous emotion and lack of unity unfortunately HB 1151 became a bad memory for many and so it was necessary to bring a squeaky clean and fresh bill with a unified support base to our Representatives and Senators. Continue reading

Public Disclosure Docs: WSDA Claims NAIS Premises Registration Database “To weird for words”, “Has a mind of its own”, “Disquieting,” and “Convoluted”, “Confusing”

The Department of Agriculture’s at the Federal and State levels have a real problem, they went along with the “brilliant” scheme to register all property if it had or has potential to make $1000.  So these Department’s of Agriculture set out upon the yellow brick road in “La-la” Land.  Now they have problems.  How so, you might ask?  Well these are actual quotes from real documents obtained under Public Disclosure which is also known as Freedom of Information (the public right to know).

  • WSDA is not even capable of providing a 2006 contract which it is required to produce to a citizen requesting a PDA requesting it.

wsda-nais-premises-database-2006-missing-contract-pages-aug-22-2006

wsda-nais-database-req-for-animal-premises-application

  • The NAIS Premises Registration Database is in the government’s own words:  “Too weird for words”, “has a mind of its own”, Is disquieting”, and “so convoluted I can’t figure it out.”  Do you really want to register your property in the NAIS Premises Registration Database that is weird, has its own mind, is disquieting, and so convoluted not even the creators or worker bees can figure it out?  Say No to the NAIS Premises Registration Database.

wsda-nais-database-to-wierd-for-words-mind-of-its-own-disquieting-so-convoluted-gov-cant-figure-it-out-july-18-2006

  • The NAIS Premises Registration Database “baffles” citizens and government alike.  Do you really want to register your property in the NAIS Premises Registration Database that “baffles” citizens and government alike?  Say No to the NAIS Premises Registration Database.

wsda-nais-premises-database-baffles-citizen-oct-30-2006

  • The NAIS Premises Registration Database doesn’t cover all scenarios such as “all my cattle were sold in in 2005 so I presume there is no need for us to fill out an application”.  Unfortunately due to the dis and mis-information of the Departments of Agriculture this citizen is wrong.  Any property that has potential or in fact has produced $1000 is subject to the Premises Registration Database, even if one does not own a single animal, or in this case the animals were sold.  As it was relay in 2005:  “once you are in the database you NEVER get out”.  Do you really want to register your property in the NAIS Premises Registration Database where fuzzy application is implemented so that you never know (nor does the government) what the program scope and boundaries are?  Say No to the NAIS Premises Registration Database.  (Other documents will be forthcoming with States begging for answers from the USDA-the states claiming they are in the hot seat). Continue reading

Judiciary: A Texas Pandemic Benchbook

This 125 page document is the benchbook for the judiciary who will be evaluating isolation, quarantine and other controversial issues surrounding the legal aspects of the pandemic influenza.

Judiciary: A Texas Benchbook Continue reading

Legal Beagle: Move along little doggies

I am the first to be an animal lover but I have learned as I have labored under legal books on the topics of law and animals that a few decades ago began a push to elevate the legal status of our companion animals. Why would this be dangerous? Because as we elevate animals status from property to more than property our status diminishes. How so? If there are limited resources and for argument sake you have a dog and a person needing additional care such as medical treatment. Who will get the limited resource? The one who legally has the higher legal status. Those of us watching the environmental movement can clearly see what has occurred. It was so effective that the model is now being used in other areas such as the merger of human and animal health care.

If you are a pet owner this article contains allot of demographics and plays on the emotional bond we have with our pets. Let the reader beware:

http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/jan08/080101a.asp

From the trenches,

Celeste