Part II: Traceability- The Dawn of a New Age in Food Control

Part II-Traceability:  Marking the Beasts

By

Celeste Bishop

January 2013 Update.  Last month the final rule for Traceability (the old NAIS) was finalized.  In rule-making it does not matter what the people want the agencies make the rules, people testify, and the agencies do what they want.  With the large public outcry from coast to coast it took the USDA a long time to meet their goals but they are now here for all of us to endure.  Stand your ground.  This month every deceptive trick in the book is coming your way to ensnare you.  Look carefully at fine print, don not answer census’s or surveys, and do not hit any simple one button gimmicks that take you into slavery.

The concept of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) was created in the bowels of international think-tanks for marking global assets.  It was commenced in the United States after the tragic events of 911, although plans for an animal disease outbreak were already being put on the books within emergency management.  Most farmers and ranchers became aware of the NAIS in late 2005, early 2006.  Historically agrarians have sounded the alarm when predators were encroaching and so too they heralded the news that a perilously dangerous time was imminent.

Since ancient times farmers have kept watch over their flocks and knew each animal intimately.The shepherd would know if something was wrong with the animal and would intervene as appropriate.Today there is a universal bureaucracy that has seized identification of animals for its own purposes.They want all premises registered, eliminating your absolute right to private property.Put simply they do not want you to own private property.Once you go through the registration process your land title is clouded and your have just transferred your ownership to a silent partner who calls the shots on what you can and cannot do.In the name of poverty alleviation governments around the world are ˜securing assets, aka animal capital. This is another reason for the increased pressure of multiple census.

Nowadays government wants to use identification of property and animals for certification of exports and to falsely bolster consumer confidence that has taken a hit from increasing food contamination.These same rulers want to increase the pressure, coerce farmers to adopt their brand of livestock production practices that are diametrically opposed to established safe and prosperous agriculture.

In order to achieve their goal, tyrannical powers are seeking to flood the agricultural market with ever-increasing herd and flock health programs and heavy handed controls on breeding and subjective genetic ˜improvement” programs. As traditional agriculture is being purged, the global control of animal movement is taking center stage as can be seen with the USDA’s recent announcement of a Traceability Framework.Simultaneously, zoning and compartmentalization is breaking the backs of sovereign countries and states in the name of controlling disease.Food security is being strongly linked with public health.Public health is being commingled with zoonoses (diseases that effect humans and animals) and food safety. A tightening noose is being put around market access.In the foreseeable future only those who are compliant will be allowed market access.The term animal welfare is being manipulated, exploited, and redefined into international definition and the public is unaware of the subtle and progressive change.

2009 Going Where No Man Has Gone Before

In 2009 the OIE held its first Animal Identification and Traceability Conference (ID &T).The objectives of this international conference simply stressed to participating countries and businesses the ˜benefits of identification and traceability and demands for a global commitment to identification & traceability.This conference served as a vehicle to raise awareness, thus familiarity, of the OIE and Codex standards. Through transparency, a free-flow of information and data from the various countries would be extracted for perfection of the final ONE food system.Technological standards are yet to be determined for future application within the total food control grid.When completed, Animal Identification & Traceability will be a seamless system that prevents gaps and duplication between standards, it will be ONE system for all.

When the USDA presented their new Traceability Framework they stressed, Encourage the use of lower-cost technology. One must carefully listen to what the USDA was saying with this statement and not project many farmer’s hope and desire that the agency was ‘˜listening’ to the people.The USDA is merely mirroring the OIE ID & T Framework of making an even technological playing field so that no countries, including poor ones, would be left behind.Applied research is now being commanded to develop cheaper and more practical tools.The socio-economic circumstances of all participants are scrutinized so ID & T calls for flexibility during implementation to be required.Hence, the USDA, in good conscience states administered by the States and Tribal Nations to provide more flexibility.

It has been determined that your veterinarian is a valuable key to bridging the gap between public and private sectors.He or she is a conduit that assists in collecting, analyzing and disseminating information.It is through the Veterinary Services (VS) that an improved legal ID& T will emerge.

What Does ID & T Guarantee?

ID & T has discovered that fear is a motivating factor in persuading people and countries to change their basic philosophies and law.The media has whipped up a Fear of the Week frenzy.The OIE, never wanting a good crisis to go wasted, is promising the peoples of the world:

What is the OIE’s Scope?

Continue reading

Pandemic Woes: Who Does What? A Simple Org Chart

Who are the lead agencies for what during a flu event?  We also are under the UN direction since the declared Level 6 .

Don’t forget the get your Freedom Packs Ready and No Constitutional No Trespassing Signs up and ready for ‘visitors’.  Have some way to copy or reproduce individual identification to accompany the Public Servant Questionnaire.

DEPARTMENTS LEADING REVIEW GROUPS

Priority # Priority Title Lead Department

1 Mass Vaccination    HHS/CDC
2 Public Health Continuity of Operation Plan   HHS/CDC
3 Surveillance and Laboratory   HHS/CDC
4 Communication   HS/CDC
5 Community-Wide Healthcare Coalitions to meet Patient Surge Expected from Pandemic Influenza     HHS/ASPR/HRSA
6 Facilitating Medical Surge  HHS/ASPR/HRSA
7 Fatality Management  HHS/ASPR/HRSA
8 Antiviral Drug Distribution Plan – submitted separately  HHS/CDC
9 Community Containment Plan – submitted separately   HHS/CDC
10 Policy Process for School Closure and the Communication Plan for this Decision ED
11 Education and Social Services in the Face of School Closures  ED
12 Sustain/Support 17 Critical Infrastructure Sectors & Key Assets DHS
13 Working with the Private Sector to Ensure Continuity of Operations for Critical Essential Services so that Critical Infrastructure Operations are as “Near Normal” as Possible for Social and Economic Well-Being DHS
14 State Plans Must Conform to all NRP/NIMS Requirements   DHS
15 Mitigate the Impact of an Influenza Pandemic on Workers in the State DHS
16 Assisting Employers in the State   DHS
17 Employment Policies during an Influenza Pandemic  DHS
18 Human Resource Policies for State Employees DHS
19 Coordination of Law Enforcement  DOJ
20 Critical Essential Function for Food Safety  USDA, HHS/FDA
21 Operational Status of State-Inspected Slaughter and food Processing Establishments Including Talmadge Aiken Plants  USDA, HHS/FDA
22 Communication Strategy for Interface with USDA food Safety Inspection Service and FDA’s Federal State Relations   USDA, HHS/FDA
23 Ensure Adequate Reporting Systems Regarding Food Safety USDA, HHS/FDA
24 State Advisories Regarding Diplomatic Missions  DOS

From the trenches,

Celeste

Public Disclosure Docs: WSDA Claims NAIS Premises Registration Database “To weird for words”, “Has a mind of its own”, “Disquieting,” and “Convoluted”, “Confusing”

The Department of Agriculture’s at the Federal and State levels have a real problem, they went along with the “brilliant” scheme to register all property if it had or has potential to make $1000.  So these Department’s of Agriculture set out upon the yellow brick road in “La-la” Land.  Now they have problems.  How so, you might ask?  Well these are actual quotes from real documents obtained under Public Disclosure which is also known as Freedom of Information (the public right to know).

  • WSDA is not even capable of providing a 2006 contract which it is required to produce to a citizen requesting a PDA requesting it.

wsda-nais-premises-database-2006-missing-contract-pages-aug-22-2006

wsda-nais-database-req-for-animal-premises-application

  • The NAIS Premises Registration Database is in the government’s own words:  “Too weird for words”, “has a mind of its own”, Is disquieting”, and “so convoluted I can’t figure it out.”  Do you really want to register your property in the NAIS Premises Registration Database that is weird, has its own mind, is disquieting, and so convoluted not even the creators or worker bees can figure it out?  Say No to the NAIS Premises Registration Database.

wsda-nais-database-to-wierd-for-words-mind-of-its-own-disquieting-so-convoluted-gov-cant-figure-it-out-july-18-2006

  • The NAIS Premises Registration Database “baffles” citizens and government alike.  Do you really want to register your property in the NAIS Premises Registration Database that “baffles” citizens and government alike?  Say No to the NAIS Premises Registration Database.

wsda-nais-premises-database-baffles-citizen-oct-30-2006

  • The NAIS Premises Registration Database doesn’t cover all scenarios such as “all my cattle were sold in in 2005 so I presume there is no need for us to fill out an application”.  Unfortunately due to the dis and mis-information of the Departments of Agriculture this citizen is wrong.  Any property that has potential or in fact has produced $1000 is subject to the Premises Registration Database, even if one does not own a single animal, or in this case the animals were sold.  As it was relay in 2005:  “once you are in the database you NEVER get out”.  Do you really want to register your property in the NAIS Premises Registration Database where fuzzy application is implemented so that you never know (nor does the government) what the program scope and boundaries are?  Say No to the NAIS Premises Registration Database.  (Other documents will be forthcoming with States begging for answers from the USDA-the states claiming they are in the hot seat). Continue reading

Got Hunger?

“History is indelibly written that revolution, anarchy, and tyranny are fellow travelers of hunger and malnutrition,” said a USDA scientist.  Lab 257

What are the consequences of families not eating well?

Back in the USSR


“The food and animal crop resources of the USSR would have to be damaged within a single growing season to the extent necessary to reduce the present average daily caloric intake from 2800 calories to 1400 calories, i.e., the starvation level. Reduction of the food resources to this level if maintained for 12 months would produce 20% fatalities, and would decrease manual labor performance by 95% and clerical and light labor by 80%.”

From the FAO:  Family Nutrition Guide

(also see Topic 11)

People who have poor diets and do not eat the right amounts of energy-rich food and nutrients are often sick and become malnourished. The type of malnutrition that occurs depends on which nutrients and how much of the required food energy are lacking (or are in excess) and for how long, and the age of the person.

1. Children and adults may eat too little food and become undernourished because they do not have enough food or they have a poor appetite. These people lack energy and many nutrients, which means:

• they have less energy so they cannot work, study or play as normal;

• their immune systems are weak so they become ill easily and/or are seriously ill;

• children stop growing and may lose weight. If very little food is eaten (often because of infection), a child may develop severe malnutrition (i.e. kwashiorkor or marasmus);

• adults lose weight. If a pregnant woman is undernourished, her unborn baby grows poorly. Continue reading

Strategic Framework for Imports

Implementing mitigation now known as prevention in the name of risk eradication. Do you really want to live in a world without risk? Never to experience life-on-the-edge? Risk has consequences that must be carefully weighed but to eliminate risk totally would be to create a very boring life.

Inter-Agency Working Group to the President: Framework for Imports

From the trenches,

Celeste

EU 2007-2013: “Prevention is better than cure”

Strategy 2007-2013

The whole animal health sector has grabbed onto the the “eradication” plan. In emergency management it what was the forth pillar but has sprung to the top in recent years, that of mitigation, stop that problem before it starts. In that way it will cost less in the end. The problem with this pillar is that it requires enormous infrastructure, government, and the now infamous industry-government partnerships that we are seeing across the board.

EU Animal Health Strategy

For those who don’t want to get their hip-waders on the key concepts of this document are: animals, animal health, risk, community, policy, competitiveness, disease, public health, framework, responsibility, and welfare. These concepts should give you an idea where the EU is coming from.

Here is a brief synopsis of the document. My comments are italicized.

In order for progressive harmonization of animal health measures and disease systems to be established the old “fragmented” approach to animal disease must be replaced.

Progressive=socialism, harmonization is determined at the global level UN & subsidiaries), disease is emphasised, and our diverse “fragmented” approach which has for centuries produced high quality animals and crops must now be replaced. Why?

The EU has complied fully with harmonization and so they now have the “legal framework” to trade in live animals and animal products.

Questionable legal frame-work. How sets the standards? What do they have to gain? What motivates them?

As value-added products came on board which have a higher incidence of disease and contamination problems a hierarchy of disease eradication programs had to be established. Due to this created value-added vulnerability public health and food safety became in increasing problem so the goal was established to control disease.

Continue reading