One Health: UN Merging of Human and Veterinary Medicine

Image of a fire breathing snake is the logo with a wobbling earth axis.  I am prevented from copying this image due to copyright of the logo within the document.

By

Celeste Bishop

The One Health agenda of merging of human and animal medicine and policy took a giant step with an announcement made earlier this year with the signing a contractual Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in Bangkok on October 13, 2012.  This meeting was kept very secret until the event actually occurred and only released to the public a week ago.

This MOU goes much further than just merging veterinary and human medicine. It will apply international standards to public education, medical science, medical art, medical ethics, and health care for all life on the planet under the guise of promoting health and well-being.  The World Health Organization (WHO) will be the hammer that will strike living creatures through a net of health systems.  They will strike in 3 year year increments with zoonotic disease, increased “food safety” (control), increased health status (healthy animals=healthy people),phasing in veterinarians into areas of zoonotic disease, food safety and other areas such as microbial controls.

Other MOU’s were signed with the OIE and FAO self-appointed United Nations animal health standard organizations.  By the way, this MOU was 666 KB. Coincidence?

Objective 1 is that the parties agree to collaborate in the One-Heath concept which is a unified veterinary and human medicine, (veterinarians and physicians) in order to improve the Global Health.

Objective 2: that the parties agree:

  • Support joint educational efforts between human and veterinary medical schools
  • Support cross species disease surveillance and control efforts
  • Collaborate the responsible use of anti-microbials (antibiotics and anti-fungals)
  • Enhance collaboration between human and veterinary medical professions in medical care, clinical care, public health, and biomedical research.

You are witnessing a day when the historical natural border of human primacy has been magically erased and animals of the human realm and traditional animal kingdom elevated to dominate man.  Bestial human animals without a soul will soon control your life.  Will you let them?  That is the question.

Yes!  I want to see the document!

 

 

 

 

 

 

FAO One Health Conference Condemns Traditional Farming

A One Health Conference was held by the FAO recently in Lyons, France with  the FAO’s Animal Health Service, Wildlife Disease Association, and EU Wildlife Disease Association and voiced concern that wildlife species are supposedly increasing at risk from increased agricultural production, loss of habitat, and wildlife-domestic animal disease transfer, and bring novel (lab created pathogens to humans and animals alike).   This gathering convened a Scientific Task Force on Wildlife and Ecosystem Health and signed legally binding multi-lateral environmental agreements and new type of agreement bypassing sovereign nations known as MEA’s. Continue reading

Part IV: The Modern Agricultural god of the Export Market?

Part IV:  The Modern Agricultural god of the Export Market?

By

Celeste Bishop

At this point you may be thinking to yourself that I have digressed a bit from current events relating to food when I begin talking about a modern agricultural god and holiday known as Saturnalia. Take a few moments of your time to journey with me through ancient mythology to understand a facet of the modern international agricultural trade market.

Embedded within a summary obtained under Public Disclosure of a Washington State trade ‘mission’ in May 2006 regarding the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) to the Pacific Region a paid government contractor, Jack Fields, in the guise of a ‘ white-hat’ cattleman lobbyist, wrote the following: “Much to my surprise every Australian I spoke with on my trip was keenly aware of the importance of export markets to Saturnalia and responded virtually the same. If the customers want it we will give it to them because the USA will not. I was thanked by a few cattlemen for the USA dragging its feet with the NAIS because Australia has been able to corner the Japanese market and, have been actively marketing their products there. The MLA also told us that recently they were visited by group from China and another group from Korea.” Continue reading

Part II: Traceability- The Dawn of a New Age in Food Control

Part II-Traceability:  Marking the Beasts

By

Celeste Bishop

January 2013 Update.  Last month the final rule for Traceability (the old NAIS) was finalized.  In rule-making it does not matter what the people want the agencies make the rules, people testify, and the agencies do what they want.  With the large public outcry from coast to coast it took the USDA a long time to meet their goals but they are now here for all of us to endure.  Stand your ground.  This month every deceptive trick in the book is coming your way to ensnare you.  Look carefully at fine print, don not answer census’s or surveys, and do not hit any simple one button gimmicks that take you into slavery.

The concept of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) was created in the bowels of international think-tanks for marking global assets.  It was commenced in the United States after the tragic events of 911, although plans for an animal disease outbreak were already being put on the books within emergency management.  Most farmers and ranchers became aware of the NAIS in late 2005, early 2006.  Historically agrarians have sounded the alarm when predators were encroaching and so too they heralded the news that a perilously dangerous time was imminent.

Since ancient times farmers have kept watch over their flocks and knew each animal intimately.The shepherd would know if something was wrong with the animal and would intervene as appropriate.Today there is a universal bureaucracy that has seized identification of animals for its own purposes.They want all premises registered, eliminating your absolute right to private property.Put simply they do not want you to own private property.Once you go through the registration process your land title is clouded and your have just transferred your ownership to a silent partner who calls the shots on what you can and cannot do.In the name of poverty alleviation governments around the world are ˜securing assets, aka animal capital. This is another reason for the increased pressure of multiple census.

Nowadays government wants to use identification of property and animals for certification of exports and to falsely bolster consumer confidence that has taken a hit from increasing food contamination.These same rulers want to increase the pressure, coerce farmers to adopt their brand of livestock production practices that are diametrically opposed to established safe and prosperous agriculture.

In order to achieve their goal, tyrannical powers are seeking to flood the agricultural market with ever-increasing herd and flock health programs and heavy handed controls on breeding and subjective genetic ˜improvement” programs. As traditional agriculture is being purged, the global control of animal movement is taking center stage as can be seen with the USDA’s recent announcement of a Traceability Framework.Simultaneously, zoning and compartmentalization is breaking the backs of sovereign countries and states in the name of controlling disease.Food security is being strongly linked with public health.Public health is being commingled with zoonoses (diseases that effect humans and animals) and food safety. A tightening noose is being put around market access.In the foreseeable future only those who are compliant will be allowed market access.The term animal welfare is being manipulated, exploited, and redefined into international definition and the public is unaware of the subtle and progressive change.

2009 Going Where No Man Has Gone Before

In 2009 the OIE held its first Animal Identification and Traceability Conference (ID &T).The objectives of this international conference simply stressed to participating countries and businesses the ˜benefits of identification and traceability and demands for a global commitment to identification & traceability.This conference served as a vehicle to raise awareness, thus familiarity, of the OIE and Codex standards. Through transparency, a free-flow of information and data from the various countries would be extracted for perfection of the final ONE food system.Technological standards are yet to be determined for future application within the total food control grid.When completed, Animal Identification & Traceability will be a seamless system that prevents gaps and duplication between standards, it will be ONE system for all.

When the USDA presented their new Traceability Framework they stressed, Encourage the use of lower-cost technology. One must carefully listen to what the USDA was saying with this statement and not project many farmer’s hope and desire that the agency was ‘˜listening’ to the people.The USDA is merely mirroring the OIE ID & T Framework of making an even technological playing field so that no countries, including poor ones, would be left behind.Applied research is now being commanded to develop cheaper and more practical tools.The socio-economic circumstances of all participants are scrutinized so ID & T calls for flexibility during implementation to be required.Hence, the USDA, in good conscience states administered by the States and Tribal Nations to provide more flexibility.

It has been determined that your veterinarian is a valuable key to bridging the gap between public and private sectors.He or she is a conduit that assists in collecting, analyzing and disseminating information.It is through the Veterinary Services (VS) that an improved legal ID& T will emerge.

What Does ID & T Guarantee?

ID & T has discovered that fear is a motivating factor in persuading people and countries to change their basic philosophies and law.The media has whipped up a Fear of the Week frenzy.The OIE, never wanting a good crisis to go wasted, is promising the peoples of the world:

What is the OIE’s Scope?

Continue reading

Down the Yellow Brick NASS Road

Step by step, let’s expose where your personal information goes once it is collected by NASS, in either survey or census format’s.

First, your information is collected via survey and census tool mechanisms.  Despite it’s “Lock Down” promotion, your personal farm information is disseminated between ‘partners’.  Who are these partners?

Click Here:  SIAP

The Agrifood and Fishery Information Service is the decentralized entity of SAGARPA

(The Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food, is a unit of the Federal Executive, which has among its objectives to foster the pursuit of a policy of support that can help produce better, better utilize the comparative advantages of our agricultural sector, integrating the activities of the rural environment productive chains from the rest of the economy, and encourage collaboration of producer organizations with programs and projects themselves, as well as the goals and objectives for the agricultural sector, the National Plan of Development)  Hey, my info goes to Mexico?????  Why is it going to Mexico?????

Click Here:  SAGARPA

responsible for designing and coordinating the operation of the National Agriculture, Food, and Fishery Sectors Information System, and also to promote the concurrence and coordination to implement the National Sustainable Rural Development Information System (SNIDRUS).

So let’s boil this down.  First NASS collects your farm data.  It then goes to Agrifood and Fishery Info Service who then gleans a sharper edge on commerce by knowing all your proprietary farm data, including breeding records and production records.

Your personal information is then swapped over to the National Sustainable Rural Development Information System, SNIDRUS.  This System is a Sustainable (Eugenic) Rual Development where your farm will be exterminated, unless you become a compliant slave to living document’s of regulations.  Where the name of the game is : What’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is mine.

Back to SIAP….

To achieve the aforementioned, SIAP requires a coordination scheme and standards framework that guides in a clear and homogeneous way the actions of the offices and entities of the Federal Public Administration and that of the state level government under a vision, mission, objectives and projects aimed at a common goal, that of generating objective, timely, quality and reliable information, for the purposes of making it available to the general public and for the decision-making support.

Mission

To provide the agricultural farmers, fishing producers and economic agents that take part in the agrifood chains, with reliable and timely information for the decision-making that contributes to the sustainable rural development.

Vision

To become the coordinating institution for the National Sustainable Rural Development Information System (SNIDRUS). Source of the statistics and geographic information for the agrifood and fishery sectors, with top quality staff and services, reknown for the objectivity, truthfulness, and timeliness of its information which is gathered with the participation of the institutions and other agents involved in the matter.

Every successful data extraction includes transfer of your farm data to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Click here:  FAO.

And that is the bottom line.  Turning over your information to the United Nations to be used against you as they set enslavement policy.

10 Minute Citizen:  Take any measure to say no to this hostile farm takeover.

From the trenches…….

FMD: The Way to Global Control

In June 2009 a FMD Conference entitled: The Way to Global Control was held in Paraguay.  The significance of FMD was highlighted in the United Kingdom when many farms and ranches were devastated not by FMD but by the resulting regulations.  Animals tenderly loved and cared for were ripped from their owners care to be culled, killed stamped out in the most groteque manner and then dumped into a pit similar to the Holocaust to be incinerated or buried.

This FMD ‘scare’ began to shape animal health policy around the world.  While the conference took place the AMVA has waited until September 15, 2009 to inform their members and the population-at-large on the final recommendations of the FMD Conference.

From the trenches…..

September 15, 2009

OIE, FAO seek to control FMD

The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization have launched an initiative to bring foot-and-mouth disease under global control.

The organizations presented the initiative in late June at an OIE/FAO conference on FMD in Paraguay. The goal is to create a long-term program for the control of FMD under the auspices of the existing Global Framework for the Progressive Control of Transboundary Animal Diseases, which the OIE and FAO signed in 2004.

The OIE recognizes almost 70 countries as FMD free, but more than 100 countries have endemic or sporadic infections. Currently, seven pools of distinct FMD virus strains exist around the world-in Africa, Asia, Europe, and South America.

Participants in the recent conference agreed that the OIE and FAO should promote new and existing regional road maps for the control of FMD. Long-term FMD-control programs in South America, the European Union, and Southeast Asia could provide templates for programs in other regions.

Other recommendations were for the OIE and FAO to communicate the need for FMD control, strengthen national veterinary services, improve global cooperation for FMD surveillance, and enhance access to diagnostic facilities. Conference participants also recommended that the OIE should consider establishing banks of FMD vaccines in strategic locations and should encourage recognition of FMD-free countries for purposes of trade in animals and animal products.

The full list of 20 recommendations is at www.oie.int under “press releases.”

From the FAO/OIE website:

FAO/OIE June 26, 2009-Paraguay

OIE/FAO Global Conference on Foot and Mouth Disease

“The way towards global control”

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Over 500 participants, including OIE national Delegates , stakeholders , representatives of FAO and other partner international organisations, key global donors, non-governmental and farmers’ organisations participated in the OIE/FAO Global Conference on Foot and Mouth Disease which took place in Asunción, Paraguay on 24-26 June 2009.

The Conference was organised with the generous contribution of the Servicio Nacional de Calidad y Salud Animal (SENACSA) of Paraguay, the Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento of Brazil, the European Commission, Spain and many other sponsors.

Below the final recommendations unanimously adopted by the participants:

Considering that:

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) has for centuries been known as a serious threat to the health and welfare of the domestic and wild animal ruminant and swine population of the world, with negative impacts on the livelihoods of animal keepers;(This particular phraseology suspends Constitutional protections)

The current lack of awareness and knowledge of the impacts of FMD at the individual producer level, and especially for the poorest farmers and the false perception that FMD is not a priority disease for poverty reduction;

The production, performance and use of large ruminants for ploughing and traction are seriously diminished when infected with FMD. Production and efficiency is further diminished in terms of quality and quantity of dairy products and weight gain ratios;

Countries infected with FMD are more prone to food insecurity as a result of the impact of FMD at household level and through reduced access to local, national and international markets and of animal draught power for agriculture;

Seventy countries in the world are already officially recognized by the OIE as free from FMD with or without vaccination while more than 100 countries are still either considered as endemically or sporadically infected with the disease;

The need of a strong commitment of all countries at a high political level to harmonise global, regional and national policies for FMD control;

The FMD virus serotypes and strains are distributed into several major virus ecological setting or reservoirs, each containing distinct regional viral strains from which new variants may emerge, which creates a demand for advanced laboratory services and technical advice to select appropriate vaccines;

The persistence of the FMDV in certain wild animals will remain a threat to the domestic ruminant population necessitating the need to monitor the disease in wild and feral animal populations and to control the disease by separating species and subpopulations of animals with different disease status;

Unprecedented globalization of trade and movement of people and animals opens the door for any virus strain to infect any part of the world;

Regional long term efforts will be needed to address the threats of FMD viruses and animal reservoirs or environmental persistence;

OIE official recognition of country and zonal freedom from FMD is an important element in the drive towards the global control of FMD and the facilitation of trade in animals and animal products;

Many developing and in transition countries are in need of assistance as they lack the necessary resources and effective veterinary services to initiate, implement or sustain a national disease control program for FMD;

Initiating an FMD control program with limited financial resources requires targeted technical support and guidance to optimize the strategy and actions to achieve rapid gains on the investment, that could stimulate further cost effective public and private expenditures;

The control and eventual eradication of FMD in a country, region or worldwide could only be achieved if the international community recognizes that the control of FMD is a global public good that will benefit all populations and future generations;

Realising an ideal of global control of FMD will be a costly and long-term process relying heavily on the sustainable availability of sufficient public and private financial resources from Governments, producers and market chain actors, and the international donor community;

Good veterinary governance is an essential pre-requisite to ensure the efficient implementation of national programs and to encourage the establishment of sustainable public-private partnerships and international support for the control of FMD on a national, regional and global level;

There is an urgent need for research in vaccines that will improve the access of countries to good quality vaccines that are fit for purpose against the prevailing field strains of the FMD virus in each virus reservoir, in each relevant species, and which can be cost effective and used in challenging environmental conditions;

There is a need for more research on the risk of products from different susceptible species imported from non-free countries;

Good examples of successful regionally co-ordinated approaches that have delivered freedom from FMD in part or whole of the areas involved are seen in the European region, in South-East Asia and South America. These long term regional programs can provide important templates for formulating co-ordinated regional and national FMD control strategies in the other affected regions of the world;

There is a need for all countries currently affected by FMD to be able to enter into a regional co-ordinated program against FMD, but national resources are limited, a progressive control pathway towards FMD freedom with or without vaccination should begin with actions feasible in all affected countries and build progressively towards official recognition of FMD freedom of zones and countries;

Countries already free of the disease and able to support global control of FMD can contribute to a win-win situation resulting in a reduced poverty in infected countries and a reduced the risk to their own territory from virus reintroductions;

International standards of the OIE for good veterinary governance, the control methods for FMD, the production and use of vaccines, the trade in and movement of animals and animal products and the diagnosis of the disease are integral in formulating a strategy for the global control of FMD;

FAO and OIE signed several cooperation agreements including GF-TADs and Regional Animal Health Centers in different regions.

THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE CONFERENCE REITERATE THEIR STRONG SUPPORT FOR A GLOBALLY COORDINATED APPROACH TO CONTROL FMD AND RECOMMEND THAT:

1. The OIE and FAO together with governments, producers and other international, regional and national role players and stakeholders must confirm and communicate the economic and social justification for recognizing officially the global control and eventual eradication of FMD as a global public good for the benefit of all populations and future generations.

2. A strategy for the global control of FMD should be regarded as an international priority and should be developed as a matter of urgency jointly by the OIE and FAO preferably under the GF-TADs platform, in consultation with the relevant international, regional and national stakeholders and donor community.

3. The OIE, FAO and other international and regional organizations concerned with FMD control realize a very high level of political communication to convince the high level policy makers in infected countries to consider FMD control as a priority using the threat of FMD transmission to neighbouring countries and regions as the thrust of their arguments.

4. The FAO supported by the OIE and relevant international organisations conduct analytical work on the significant impacts of FMD on wealth creation, food security and gender issues, that would create a clear incentive for the governments and then the international community to increase investments in this sector and to do so in a more strategic manner.

5. The OIE with the support of FAO pursue and further intensify its efforts to establish the application of good veterinary governance in developing and in transition countries to pave the way for sustainable public-private partnerships and involvement of the international donor community in support of a global strategy for the control of FMD.

6. A strategy for the global control for FMD should incorporate and acknowledge existing and ongoing national and regional mechanisms that have already achieved progress in moving towards the regional control of FMD such as those of the Hemispheric FMD Eradication Plan for bi- or tri-national border zones, the CVP/MERCOSUR, SEAFMD, European Union and the EUFMD

7. The FAO and OIE should continue their efforts to promote long term, coordinated regional initiatives (roadmaps) for the progressive control of FMD covering each of the major virus reservoirs;

8. OIE standards regarding quality of vaccines must be strictly respected by all countries worldwide, and mechanisms for quality assurance observed.

9. Further research on the development of effective and quality vaccines and the availability of vaccines at diminished cost for all prevailing field strains of the FMD virus for all susceptible domestic animals be encouraged and expedited with the emphasis on the availability, cost-effectiveness and safe use under challenging environmental conditions.

10. The OIE with the support of FAO and in collaboration with the international donor community, consider the establishment of vaccine banks for FMD vaccines in strategic locations and in support of regional FMD control programs.

11. The establishment of and access to diagnostic facilities for the quick and efficient diagnosis of FMD be further enhanced through initiatives such as the OIE laboratory twinning program and the FAO laboratories network development program. Diagnostic tests must comply with standards of the OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals and their inscription into the OIE register of all diagnostic tests is recommended.

12. The OIE continue to update existing international standards for FMD and encourage the official recognition of countries and zones listed free from the disease. In the updating of international standards the OIE should encourage further research to allow the safe trade in animal products without unjustified barriers to trade while recognizing the needs of developing and in transition countries which are still progressing along the pathway towards the progressive control or eradication of FMD, while protecting free countries from virus reintroduction and maintaining efficient veterinary services and field surveillance of the disease.

13. FAO should continue to support national capacity building of developing and in transition countries to comply with OIE standards, and should develop the methods, guides, tools, training and technical support to member states for the introduction and implementation of the progressive control pathway at national level;

14. OIE and FAO organise as a next step a pledging conference with free and infected countries, and relevant organisations and donors, to support a global control program starting with relevant regional activities. The conference noted the candidature of the People’s Republic of China to host the next conference.

15. In support of the global programme, the FAO and OIE organize regular global scientific meetings on FMD control, rotating around the affected regions. The conference noted the candidature of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research to host the next FMD global scientific meeting (in 2010 or 2011).

16. The OIE develops its capacities for disease status recognition to support adequately the increase of number of countries and zones requesting recognition following the implementation of the new global control program.

17. FAO with the political and normative support of the OIE should strengthen its capacities to technically support national and regional roadmap development for the progressive control of FMD at national and regional level, thereby contributing to the global control of this high-impact disease.

18. The OIE and FAO should support epidemiological networks and strengthen cooperation for national, regional and global surveillance systems for FMD. Transparency and timely disease reporting to WAHIS is a key element to protect FMD free countries and zones and monitoring the progress of FMD control in endemic areas.

19. National governments and regional organizations should actively encourage the support and cooperation of nature and wildlife conservation organizations when formulating national and regional control strategies for FMD control

20. National governments should in the development of disease control programs for FMD, give due consideration for the inclusion of compensation mechanisms for livestock owners in consultation with the private sector and the donor community.

Got Hunger?

“History is indelibly written that revolution, anarchy, and tyranny are fellow travelers of hunger and malnutrition,” said a USDA scientist.  Lab 257

What are the consequences of families not eating well?

Back in the USSR


“The food and animal crop resources of the USSR would have to be damaged within a single growing season to the extent necessary to reduce the present average daily caloric intake from 2800 calories to 1400 calories, i.e., the starvation level. Reduction of the food resources to this level if maintained for 12 months would produce 20% fatalities, and would decrease manual labor performance by 95% and clerical and light labor by 80%.”

From the FAO:  Family Nutrition Guide

(also see Topic 11)

People who have poor diets and do not eat the right amounts of energy-rich food and nutrients are often sick and become malnourished. The type of malnutrition that occurs depends on which nutrients and how much of the required food energy are lacking (or are in excess) and for how long, and the age of the person.

1. Children and adults may eat too little food and become undernourished because they do not have enough food or they have a poor appetite. These people lack energy and many nutrients, which means:

• they have less energy so they cannot work, study or play as normal;

• their immune systems are weak so they become ill easily and/or are seriously ill;

• children stop growing and may lose weight. If very little food is eaten (often because of infection), a child may develop severe malnutrition (i.e. kwashiorkor or marasmus);

• adults lose weight. If a pregnant woman is undernourished, her unborn baby grows poorly. Continue reading

FAO Issues: State of the World’s Food AnGR

Are you tired? Hungry? Concerned that the food you eat is safe? Well the UN’s-FAO has a global plan to ‘protect’ animal genetic resources-that will surely solve your woes, won’t it? And how cheery….it was adopted on 9/11. And notice the acronym, AnGR, coincidence?

IMPLEMENTING THE GLOBAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES

The FAO has determined that breeds of domesticated farm animal species are the primary biological capital for:

• Livestock development,

• Food security

• Sustainable rural development.

Yet this global organization feels the value of the vast majority of animal genetic resources is poorly understood.

The FAO believed that the 20th century has concentrated on a very small number of breeds worldwide, frequently without due consideration to the local production environment forces impacting on a breeds’ ability to survive, reproduce and produce.

The management of this biological capital has been neglected resulting into substantive eroding. It is the belief of the FAO that this trend is likely to accelerate with the massive increase in demand for livestock products mimicking the effective Ron Paul Revolution campaign adopting the banner the Livestock Revolution.

The FAO suggests the use and development of livestock breeds, and the conservation of valuable breeds of little current interest to farmers must be substantially upgraded for future food security and sustainable rural development.

Sustainable utilization, development and conservation are critical and complementary technical elements. A range of rapidly developing molecular and reproductive biotechnologies also has important implications for AnGR management.

FAO has the global mandate to develop the First Country-driven Report on the State of the World’s AnGR, and the Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources.

http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/genetics/documents/Interlaken/ITC-AnGR073_en.pdf

The IPFSAPH Portal

The IPFSAPH is one of the Star-Gates of international food control. This portal is your access to the global ‘guidelines’ that will affect you and your food and farm. Here is a summary of the gate with pertinent links:

What is the purpose of IPFSAPH?

IPFSAPH was developed to:

  • Provide a means of accessing ‘official information’ on food safety, animal and plant health relevant to the SPS Agreement; and
  • Facilitate cross-cutting queries (i.e. do more than just access data sets of standard setting bodies and the WTO).

The portal’s goal is to facilitate trade in food and agriculture products and support the implementation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement by providing a reliable single access point for authorized international and national information across the sectors of food safety, animal and plant health.

This cross-sectoral approach to information management supports an integrated approach to biosecurity, and helps to avoid information gaps resulting from the dispersal of data sets across diverse organizations.

Who developed, operates and finances IPFSAPH?

IPFSAPH is a joint undertaking between a number of SPS-recognized standard-setting organizations and international agencies. It was developed by FAO in association with Codex Alimentarius, the IPPC Secretariat and OIE. Continue reading

Famine Watch: U.N.- Desperate Haitians Eating Mud (Americans Next?)

The next time the USDA or your state Department of Agriculture tries to say that the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is needed for safety and security ask them what you will eat when the regulations devour up agriculture to the degree that all that will be left is mud. Food is going up everywhere, in impoverished countries as well as industrialized nations. The UN and sub-agencies promise nutricious, safe, and secure food as they spread their umbrella to include all countries across the globe. We Americans need to take note that the UN looks with favor on the impoverished nations but we Americans, they despise. Maybe we won’t even merit mud. So think twice about signing up for programs such as NAIS that take away your food freedom and expose you to contaminated food, IF you get food at all.

“It stops the hunger,” said Marie-Carmelle Baptiste, who makes mud cakes. “You eat them when you have to.”

(UPI) – People in Haiti have become so desperate for food that many are eating mud, U.N. officials said.

U.N. officials say that food is available in the impoverished Caribbean nation, The Guardian reported. But prices are rising so fast that the Food and Agriculture Organization predicts that food will cost 80 percent more at the end of the year than it did in January.

The high prices come in a country where much of the population is already living on the edge. The United Nations says that two-thirds of Haitians live on less than $1 a day.

In normal times, pregnant women use mud cakes as a source of calcium. Now, they are famine food.

“It stops the hunger,” said Marie-Carmelle Baptiste, who makes mud cakes. “You eat them when you have to.”

The cakes’ raw material comes from a clay deposit outside Port-au-Prince. Baptiste said they have become more expensive to make, but she does not want to raise her prices until she has to because she knows that, for her customers, the cakes are the last resort.