Part IV: The Modern Agricultural god of the Export Market?

Part IV:  The Modern Agricultural god of the Export Market?

By

Celeste Bishop

At this point you may be thinking to yourself that I have digressed a bit from current events relating to food when I begin talking about a modern agricultural god and holiday known as Saturnalia. Take a few moments of your time to journey with me through ancient mythology to understand a facet of the modern international agricultural trade market.

Embedded within a summary obtained under Public Disclosure of a Washington State trade ‘mission’ in May 2006 regarding the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) to the Pacific Region a paid government contractor, Jack Fields, in the guise of a ‘ white-hat’ cattleman lobbyist, wrote the following: “Much to my surprise every Australian I spoke with on my trip was keenly aware of the importance of export markets to Saturnalia and responded virtually the same. If the customers want it we will give it to them because the USA will not. I was thanked by a few cattlemen for the USA dragging its feet with the NAIS because Australia has been able to corner the Japanese market and, have been actively marketing their products there. The MLA also told us that recently they were visited by group from China and another group from Korea.” Continue reading

Part II: Traceability- The Dawn of a New Age in Food Control

Part II-Traceability:  Marking the Beasts

By

Celeste Bishop

January 2013 Update.  Last month the final rule for Traceability (the old NAIS) was finalized.  In rule-making it does not matter what the people want the agencies make the rules, people testify, and the agencies do what they want.  With the large public outcry from coast to coast it took the USDA a long time to meet their goals but they are now here for all of us to endure.  Stand your ground.  This month every deceptive trick in the book is coming your way to ensnare you.  Look carefully at fine print, don not answer census’s or surveys, and do not hit any simple one button gimmicks that take you into slavery.

The concept of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) was created in the bowels of international think-tanks for marking global assets.  It was commenced in the United States after the tragic events of 911, although plans for an animal disease outbreak were already being put on the books within emergency management.  Most farmers and ranchers became aware of the NAIS in late 2005, early 2006.  Historically agrarians have sounded the alarm when predators were encroaching and so too they heralded the news that a perilously dangerous time was imminent.

Since ancient times farmers have kept watch over their flocks and knew each animal intimately.The shepherd would know if something was wrong with the animal and would intervene as appropriate.Today there is a universal bureaucracy that has seized identification of animals for its own purposes.They want all premises registered, eliminating your absolute right to private property.Put simply they do not want you to own private property.Once you go through the registration process your land title is clouded and your have just transferred your ownership to a silent partner who calls the shots on what you can and cannot do.In the name of poverty alleviation governments around the world are ˜securing assets, aka animal capital. This is another reason for the increased pressure of multiple census.

Nowadays government wants to use identification of property and animals for certification of exports and to falsely bolster consumer confidence that has taken a hit from increasing food contamination.These same rulers want to increase the pressure, coerce farmers to adopt their brand of livestock production practices that are diametrically opposed to established safe and prosperous agriculture.

In order to achieve their goal, tyrannical powers are seeking to flood the agricultural market with ever-increasing herd and flock health programs and heavy handed controls on breeding and subjective genetic ˜improvement” programs. As traditional agriculture is being purged, the global control of animal movement is taking center stage as can be seen with the USDA’s recent announcement of a Traceability Framework.Simultaneously, zoning and compartmentalization is breaking the backs of sovereign countries and states in the name of controlling disease.Food security is being strongly linked with public health.Public health is being commingled with zoonoses (diseases that effect humans and animals) and food safety. A tightening noose is being put around market access.In the foreseeable future only those who are compliant will be allowed market access.The term animal welfare is being manipulated, exploited, and redefined into international definition and the public is unaware of the subtle and progressive change.

2009 Going Where No Man Has Gone Before

In 2009 the OIE held its first Animal Identification and Traceability Conference (ID &T).The objectives of this international conference simply stressed to participating countries and businesses the ˜benefits of identification and traceability and demands for a global commitment to identification & traceability.This conference served as a vehicle to raise awareness, thus familiarity, of the OIE and Codex standards. Through transparency, a free-flow of information and data from the various countries would be extracted for perfection of the final ONE food system.Technological standards are yet to be determined for future application within the total food control grid.When completed, Animal Identification & Traceability will be a seamless system that prevents gaps and duplication between standards, it will be ONE system for all.

When the USDA presented their new Traceability Framework they stressed, Encourage the use of lower-cost technology. One must carefully listen to what the USDA was saying with this statement and not project many farmer’s hope and desire that the agency was ‘˜listening’ to the people.The USDA is merely mirroring the OIE ID & T Framework of making an even technological playing field so that no countries, including poor ones, would be left behind.Applied research is now being commanded to develop cheaper and more practical tools.The socio-economic circumstances of all participants are scrutinized so ID & T calls for flexibility during implementation to be required.Hence, the USDA, in good conscience states administered by the States and Tribal Nations to provide more flexibility.

It has been determined that your veterinarian is a valuable key to bridging the gap between public and private sectors.He or she is a conduit that assists in collecting, analyzing and disseminating information.It is through the Veterinary Services (VS) that an improved legal ID& T will emerge.

What Does ID & T Guarantee?

ID & T has discovered that fear is a motivating factor in persuading people and countries to change their basic philosophies and law.The media has whipped up a Fear of the Week frenzy.The OIE, never wanting a good crisis to go wasted, is promising the peoples of the world:

What is the OIE’s Scope?

Continue reading

Part I: The Dawning of a New Age of Food Control (5-Part Series)

Part 1: The Great Food Heist

By

Celeste Bishop

All Images from governmental documents and powerpoints

For Educational Purposes Only

February 5, 2010 was the dawn of a new age of food control.  Food freedom in the world as we have known it has died. The sun is emerging with the dawn of a sophisticated control system that neither ourselves nor our fathers have ever known. Behind the facade of ‘safe food’ is a web of deception, intrigue, power, money, and deep spiritual truths.  Are you ready for the most cataclysmic event that the world has ever witnessed?

With winks and handshakes the world’s food supply was taken down and is currently being resurrected by a leviathan monster under the auspices of the Office International des Epizooties (OIE).  The OIE was established in 1924 and reorganized under the new name, the World Organization of Animal Health, in 2003.  The OIE has 177 permanent countries that adhere to its guidelines.  The World Trade Organization (WTO) has ONE mandate, the ‘improvement of animal health and welfare all around the world’.  The organization has published and implemented a series of complex global treaties including the WTO Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary Treaty (WTO SPS) that purports to safeguard world trade. This multilateral framework established the Terrestrial Animal Health Code as a toolkit to dominate all life forms on our planet. The Terrestrial Animal Health Code adopts the Three Sisters under its umbrella.

The Three Sisters

Continue reading

The Vanishing Vet Trick

What is one of the many lessons learned and outcome of the UK FMD outbreak?  Veterinarians vanished from the pastoral rolling hills of the United Kingdom.  With the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) entrenched in the US along with other draconian regulations veterinarians are now finding themselves out of a job.  What is the answer?  They get in the federal handout line just like the bankers, insurance companies and other private industry who are putting out their hands for “free” taxpayer money.  Are you willing to pay the high cost of NAIS and subsidize your local veterinarian who gets paid $10 bucks for signing you up for NAIS?

Lo and behold, there is a Support your Veterinarian bill in Congress!  Geesh, what a surprise!

http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/sep09/090915a_pf.asp

From the trenches…..

Veterinary services legislation
introduced in Congress

Bipartisan bill would expand veterinary services nationwide

New legislation addressing the nation’s veterinary services needs is under consideration in the House of Representatives.

The AVMA played a key role in crafting the Veterinarian Services Investment Act (H.R. 3519), which was introduced July 31 by Republican Adrian Smith of Nebraska and Democrat Leonard Boswell of Iowa and had 17 co-sponsors as of mid-August. Continue reading

Washington State Senate Introduces Voluntary NAIS

S-1526.1
SENATE BILL 5956

State of Washington 61st Legislature 2009 Regular Session

By Senators Schoesler, Shin, Stevens, Zarelli, Marr, and Benton
Read first time 02/10/09. Referred to Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development.
1 AN ACT Relating to voluntary participation in a state or national 2 animal identification system; and adding a new section to chapter 16.57 3 RCW.

4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

5 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 16.57 RCW 6 to read as follows: 7 (1) Voluntary participation in any state or national animal 8 identification system must be obtained with informed written consent. 9 (2) No officer, agency, or instrumentality of the state, in
10 conjunction with the implementation of any state or national animal 11 identification system, may: 12 (a) Mandate, coerce, use exclusionary tactics, support, or 13 otherwise force participation in a state or national animal 14 identification system; 15 (b) Register real property, assign real property identification 16 numbers, or otherwise enroll any person in a state or national animal 17 identification system without the person’s prior knowledge and written 18 consent;

p.1 SB5956
1 (c) Withhold, from any person, indemnity based on the person’s 2 status of participation in a state or national animal identification 3 system; or 4 (d) Deny, revoke, or limit services, certificates, licenses, 5 permits, grants, or other benefits or incentives to any person based on 6 the person’s status of participation in a state or national animal 7 identification system. 8 (3) Nothing in this section prohibits: 9 (a) The state from establishing or participating in disease control

10 programs specifically designed to address a specific disease in a 11 specific species of livestock; 12 (b) Private agricultural industry organizations from establishing 13 any source verification program; or 14 (c) Any person from voluntarily participating in a state or 15 national animal identification system. 16 (4) For the purposes of this section, “voluntary” means acting or 17 done without compulsion or obligation.
—END –¬
SB5956 p.2

WA Voluntary NAIS Participation Bills are UP! We need your help

Washington State Voluntary NAIS has been introduced:

House and Senate

Six Steps to Farming Freedom

Status Report

Accompanying Documentation

“This is fantastic news,” said one Washington NoNAIS person upon hearing that House Bill (HB) 2086 was read this morning and assigned to the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, and also that Senate Bill (SB) 5956 was read this morning and introduced to the Senate Agricultural and Rural Economic Development Committee at 10:30 this morning.

A team of three hit the Capital last Monday representing three impacted sectors: a Realtor, a livestock auctioneer, and a public relations manager. This team of three also represented the following species: bovine, horses, goats and poultry. With great enthusiasm and support on Friday proposed legislation regarding, “Voluntary participation in the National Animal Identification System”, known as NAIS, went into play in the Senate and the House.

Representative Shelly Short sponsored HB 2086.

Senator Mark Schoesler sponsored SB 5956.

(Please take time to thank these Legislator’s)

Both bills are located on the www.nonaiswa.org website. The proposed legislation language is identical, and is commonly referred to as Companion Bill set.

February 20th is our cutoff date for both HB 2086 and SB 5956. The Agricultural Committee Chairs must decide to hold a public hearing and move HB 2086 and SB 5956 by February 20th or the bill(s) die in committee.

The chairman of the Senate Ag Committee is Senator Brian Hatfield:

Email: hatfield.brian@leg.wa.gov

Phone: (360) 786-7636

The chair of the House Ag Committee is Representative Brian Blake.

Email: blake.brian@leg.wa.gov

Phone: (360) 786-7870

We Need Your Help!

NOW is the time we need your help! The team of three spent the entire last week in Olympia ~ 5 days ~ meeting with our representatives, educating, asking for support, asking for sponsors of these bills.  NOW IT IS UP TO YOU…

Proposed Legislation, HB 2086 & SB 5956 Status

HB 2086 and SB 5956 are new fresh new bills with new prime sponsors and new supporters. It is important to note that HB 2086 is not HB 1151. Due to the tremendous emotion and lack of unity unfortunately HB 1151 became a bad memory for many and so it was necessary to bring a squeaky clean and fresh bill with a unified support base to our Representatives and Senators. Continue reading

Public Disclosure Docs: Inside the Auspicious WSDA 3033 CATTLE Advisory Committee

This committee was established by the legislature for the sole purpose of implementing the National Animal Identification System known as NAIS for the agri-cattle business.  It was never the Legislature’s intent that it would be applied to livestock or any other small farmer or rancher.  Any attempt to play the semantic shell game substituting livestock, or including small ranchers and farmers, will be met with intense resistance.

wsda-3033-agenda-jan-3-2007

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-june-21-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-aug-16-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-aug-22-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-june-13-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-oct-6-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-oct-11-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-oct-23-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-sept-29-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-agenda-oct-26-27-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-attendence-sheet-june-13-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-charter-and-guidelines-june-19-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-letter-to-rep-joel-kretz-june-23-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-materials-oct-13-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-media-manipulation-june-19-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-meeting-notes-sept-1-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-meeting-notes-sept-29-2006-working-with-religious-groups

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-misc-e-mail-and-notes-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-misc-notes-e-mails-oct-23-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-recommendations-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-recommendations-oct-4-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-recommendations-oct-11-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-selling-traditional-farming-to-international-interests-Swsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-misc-emails-and-notes-2006 Sept-20-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-committee-sept-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-contact-sheet-no-date

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-group-contact-list-june-8-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-meeting-notes-nov-13-2006

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-meeting-notes-nov-13-2006

wsda-3033-dec-18-2006-meeting-e-mail-to-discuss-database-and-to-increase-stakeholder-buy-in

wsda-3033-group-recommendations-oct-2006

wsda-3033-misc-e-mails-oct-2006

wsda-3033-misc-e-mails-oct-2006

wsda-3033-nais-cattle-advisory-committee-aug-2006

wsda-3033-nais-cattle-advisory-committee-notes-approved-aug-25-2006

wsda-3033-nais-cattle-advisory-meeting-minutes-all-phases-of-nais-oct-26-27-2006-w-public-comments

wsda-3033-cattle-advisory-group-sept-2006-nais-discussion-people-fear-holes-what-holes-see-next-document-for-the-holes-tracking-people-who-do-not-higher-concern-than-cattle

More coming, check back……..

Unique Identification Are you part of the Global Herd?

Fair Use Access WSDA

Unique identification is coming to you, your land, and your private property.  As the USDA documents, plans, and guidelines roll out, over and over the term *unique* is used in the first two components of the National Animal Identification System known as NAIS or ADT known as Traceability . The word *unique* is in the Premises Identification and Animal Identification components. Is the use of this word coincidental or is it purposefully crafted with a subtle but deeper meaning? Continue reading

Dangers of Tattoo Removal

From FDA/CFSAN

What Risks Are Involved in Tattooing?

The following are the primary complications that can result from tattooing:

  • Infection. Unsterile tattooing equipment and needles can transmit infectious diseases, such as hepatitis and skin infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (“staph”) bacteria*. Tattoos received at facilities not regulated by your state or at facilities that use unsterile equipment (or re-use ink) may prevent you from being accepted as a blood or plasma donor for twelve months.
  • Removal problems. Despite advances in laser technology, removing a tattoo is a painstaking process, usually involving several treatments and considerable expense. Complete removal without scarring may be impossible.
  • Allergic reactions. Although FDA has received reports of numerous adverse reactions. Reports of allergic reactions to tattoo ink have been rare. However, when they happen they may be particularly troublesome because the ink can be hard to remove. Occasionally, an allergic reaction may develop to tattoos had for years.
  • Granulomas.These are nodules that may form around material that the body perceives as foreign, such as particles of tattoo ink.
  • Keloid formation. If you are prone to developing keloids — scars that grow beyond normal boundaries — you are at risk of keloid formation from a tattoo. Keloids may form any time you injure or traumatize your skin. Micropigmentation: State of the Art, a book written by Charles Zwerling, M.D., Annette Walker, R.N., and Norman Goldstein, M.D., states that keloids occur more frequently as a consequence of tattoo removal.
  • MRI complications. There have been reports of people with permanent tattoos who experienced swelling or burning in the affected areas when undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There also have been reports of tattoo ink interfering with the quality of the image. The cause of these complications is uncertain. Some have theorized that they result from an interaction with the metallic components of some inks.
  • Should an animal require an MRI on advice of a Veterinarian the owner should advise the radiologist or technician that the animal has a RFID tattoo so appropriate precautions and avoidance of complications can be implemented

Imagine for a moment that you have been coerced or lulled into a false sense of security and have proceeded to implant into the flesh a RFID implant or tattoo. You have read about the dangers and now want to have it removed.

A common problem that may develop with tattoos is the desire to remove them. Removing tattoos can be very difficult.

Although tattoos may be satisfactory at first, they sometimes fail to produce the “promised” product, eradication of disease. Also, if the tattooist injects the ink too deeply into the skin, the ink may migrate beyond the original sites, resulting in a blurred appearance.

Another cause of dissatisfaction is that the body changes over time. What is the technological marvel of today may be obsolete in the future resulting your “tag” beingcoming dated and being forced to continually “update” your RFID much as we are force to do with our computers and software. Your “tag” could become not only an embarrassment as you strive to keep up with the ‘Jones’s’ in our technological rush. Your outdated “tag” could pose a ‘security risk’ or worse yet you might become prey denial of access or ownership as the lines blur (purposefully) between identification and ownership.

While exploring the toptic of tattoo removal I came across some interesting discussions regarding other problems and considerations with this technology:

  • While this approach is useful, it clearly doesn’t SAVE live.
  • With any kind of read range how long before animal rustlers ‘detect’ safe and quality animals for sale or dinner. As our food supply becomes increasingly tainted safe food is going to look better and better.
  • Even a minimal read range may be criminally used to automatically trigger an ‘intentional device’ once the desired number of RFID’s are in a concentrated area such as a large feedlot
  • Since virtually none of the non-American animals is even going to have “RFID enhancement”, these foreign animals will be totally invisible to the IFF-triggered sensors.
  • Anything that compromises animal location is a BAD THING. It can potential detect you, the owner’s location. If you really want RFID identification then get an eartag or dog tag with the cancer chip embedded into it. Don’t implant a potential cancer maker into the flesh of any living creature. That is only common sense.
  • Ponder the thought of your RFID animal coming (very soon) under international regulation and control.
  • RFID tattoos present permanent lifetime control (to whom?)
  • See: RESET-Roadmap for European research on Smartcard Technologies www.ercim.org/reset/seminar/wg.ppt
  • Once the ID is applied to the flesh from a single-use vial of ink. If this is to be used within the NAIS authentication / authorization scheme, disposal of the leftover ink is going to be a big problem. One could potentially pocket a vial from the waste port of the tattoo gun and impersonate a whole legion of animals all at once.
  • In respect to body or carcass identification? Will the tattooed portion of the body will be intact?

Changing RFID tattoos are not as easy as changing your mind.

From the trenches,

Celeste