Archive for the “Industry” Category

Where Angles Fear to Tread: ‘Terror’forming the Planet



NASA Goddard Flight Centerhttp://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=2429

Celeste Bishop

[…] And God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.”  And God made and separated the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament.  And it was so.  And God called the firmament Heaven.”  It is called Heaven partially due to the fact that its composition makes a hostile environment that no life form can survive nor any human habitation, lest man in his arrogance think he has the technical ability and wisdom to inhabit the heavens.   The Heaven, ‘rakiya’, arises as a result of sunlight being reflected back from the earth.It is interesting to note that when God created the Heavens and separated the waters He did not say it was good, He said, “And it was so.”  It was not until God named Heaven and the waters were gathered creating dry land and the seas that God said, “It is good.”


Asilomar II: Geo-Engineering Conference Powerpoint


Asilomar II: Geo-Engineering Conference Powerpoint

Today it is important to have a basic understanding of our atmosphere and its characteristics.  Most of us have taken our skies for granted, but no more.  Look up!  In Luke 21:28  And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. Since the 1830’s, with increasing fervor, our climate has been undergoing geo-engineering attack.  We are, as one scientist attending the Asilomar II conference on Geo Engineering said, “We are at a tipping point.”


Asilomar II: Geo-Engineering Conference Powerpoint

Benchmark years for modifying our atmosphere are 1830, 1890, 1920, and of course the 1950’s and 1960’s.  Certain people are driving this change which is being implemented despite the fact that most people know nothing about climate modification and neither do their policy makers. Do you thin your policy-maker is unaware?  Think again.

Porkers Calling for the Return of Animal ID Pork

Celeste Bishop

It has been determined by the President, Congress, and the Agricultural Committee that after years and millions of wasted taxpayer dollars the experiment to alter traditional animal identification methods failed dismally. But the porkers, true to their kind, want pork and more of it.  The porkers along with the Cattleman’s Association did fabulous acting jog pretending to be “the industry” when they went crying to state and Congressional leaders.   The USDA program known as the National Animal Identification System (NAIS)  was bold in their demands:

1.  Register all property (whether you own an animal or now, if you have potential to make $1000 from your property, not that you are making more, just the potential.  Why even apartment dwellers can do that.

2.  Electronically identify animals which we now know causes cancer thanks to the diligent work of Dr. Katherine Albrecht and an investigative reporter.  This was also a slam-dunk profit maker for new electronic identification methods.

3. 24/7 surveillance-Your papers please!  Health officials, under the Emergency Clause, not only in the US but around the world suspended national and state Constitutions as a few wealthy  individuals breached sovereign borders to make a few more dollars for their pockets.  If you take your chicken to the vet or travel on the roads or or maybe even take one of your animals for a walk it was proposed that you must file an extensive electronic report and carry the animals papers at all times.

Everyone you mention this scheme to thinks it is ludicrous!  Nevertheless farmers had to leave their farm, which by the way grow your food, to take to the marbled halls so that they could farm without squashing regulations.  The herald that funding had been terminated after this extravagant experiment brought a respite of sorts though several problems remained.

Most Americans are unaware of the the semantic shell game that goes on in the realm of politics.  NAIS was known as a contentious program yet the Department’s of Agriculture  persisted until the outcry became so loud that they could not dismiss it.  The USDA easily solved this dilemma with a pitch-fork response:  rename NAIS to Animal Disease Traceability; hold consensus meeting that really aren’t about the USDA listening to “We the People” (of course they do not have to listen because no where in our founding documents does it mention AGENCY, Department, Bureau, etc…; and lastly to bring back the pork ringer’s to squeal loud enough to drown out the voice of Americans saying, “No”.  One last thing you need to know as an American who needs to eat.  The Federal government knows that you need to eat and so their is a potential money-making operation laying in wait.  The Fed’s offered your state hard, cold cash, to receive grant money for NAIS.  The fine print of that contract, SF 424 A & B put your state on the hook to implement a whole lot more than NAIS, it included the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, and numerous Executive Orders.  Your state had to implement all of these to get the cash and then provide Quarterly Reports on their progress.


Why are we in this predicament?

High food prices and contaminated food are a consequence of the United States signing on as a Member to the United Nations and branches such as the OIE who partly manages our food.  The a series of treaties were signed that supposedly we had to go along with in the modern global socialist governance.  It is claimed that these treaties supersede our Constitution.  This is only the case if we voluntarily allow these treaties to be a highest law in our land.

Long ago it was determined that Americans had not more right to food than anyone else around the world so the UN along with its partner Congress decided to “level the playing field”.  What does this mean to you?   Everybody gets the same nutrition, calories, access to food, quantity.  And for good measure it is an excellent funding mechanism because everybody has to eat.

Can the government of the United States actually control and eradicate disease by a money-grubbing program?  The article below mentions all the jobs and wealth this animal identification program will create.  It fails to note that farmers will be driven out of business due to crushing OIE regulations and the cost to support global governance.  It  is laughable this article also says an animal ID program will “save the animals”.  The stark truth of the matter is that the porker’s nor global government cares one single animal.  The only thing that matters is the bottom dollar and making as much of it as they can.

Ponder these things when you go to your local grocery store.  You would do far better economically and health-wise to support your local farmers.  Choose farmers you really trust who  are not really big-agri-business in a sheep suit.  That put’s the porker’s  out of the game, unless you want to be poor and then die from poisoned and fake food.

10 Minute Sovereign:  Call your Congressmen and women, tell them: “No to funding on Animal Disease Traceability.  It is a waste of time and money and we no longer have that luxury.”  If you have a few additional minutes call the Senate Ag Committee and tell them the same thing.  Make sure your voice is heard.  We need to drown out the porker’s who have had their day for their animal identification venture.  Let’s return our Constitution to its rightful spot and return to our traditional ways that made this country the greatest nation in the world.  Apathy and failure to get involved on your part, yes you eat you best get involved, will otherwise sink America’s food supply and it will go down faster than the Titanic.  Is this what you want for your children and grandchildren.  It is food for thought.  Think about it instead of some other activity you are scheduled to do today.

The Porker’s are Back!

This is an article from VetWeb and is for Educational Purposes Only

Calling it vital to the United States livestock industry’s ability to more quickly control and eradicate foreign animal diseases and keep export markets open, the National Pork Producers Council urged Congress to restore funding for a national animal identification system.

In letters sent to the chairmen and ranking members of the agriculture subcommittees of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees, NPPC said the pork industry’s competitiveness and its exports, which create thousands of jobs and generate wealth, are threatened by the failure of the U.S. to implement an animal ID plan.

“Hey man! You want some ‘psychotropic’ raw milk?”

All images are for Educational Purposes.  They are from the NIAA Raw Milk presentations

Can I be frank? The government is down right lying to the American consumer that raw milk is dangerous and might even (you can just hear those conspiracy UFO’s humming) contain “bugs” that are double-agents as ‘psychotropic drugs’. The FDA and their public-private partner friends have come up with a new line to scare unwary consumers into believing that raw milk is a psychotropic drug and it kills babies. Is psychotropic anything  like psychedelic?  The only commonality is that they relax the body and mind, but we will get to that later.

The concept of milk being a psychotropic drug was introduced at the NIAA conference in March. The NIAA is the “Ag Conference” that directs US agricultural trends for the year at the behest of the OIE, self-appointed ‘Organization for Animal Health’; and the FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization, both branches of the United Nations. According to Dr. Vasavada, a speaker at NIAA, raw milk contains “less recognized” and “presumptive” pathogens. Just what are these pathogens and are they something about which the consumer needs to be aware?

June 3, 2010 Posted Under Food Fight, Health, Industry, Money Talks

Stop! Your Food is an ‘Unapproved Drug’

(NaturalNews) The Alliance for Natural Health, a nonprofit organization committed to protecting access to natural and integrative medicine, has recently come up with a Congressional bill designed to stop government censorship of truthful, scientific health claims about natural foods and herbs, and restore free speech to natural health. The Free Speech About Science Act (FSAS), also known as HR 4913, will allow manufacturers and producers to reference peer-reviewed, scientific studies that highlight the health benefits of a particular food or herb that they grow or sell.

‘Go-Go’ Michelle Announces a ‘Real Private-Public Partnership’: One Trillion Calories to be Cut by 2012

“History is indelibly written that revolution, anarchy, and tyranny are fellow travelers of hunger and malnutrition,” said a USDA scientist.

In order to “Save the Planet’ and the “War on Poverty [Obesity, in the USA] the the food industry is going to act voluntarily[with a little help from their strong arm Fed-Friends] to help reduce obesity in America.

A group of food manufacturers has announced they will cut 1 trillion calories by the end of 2012, and 1.5 trillion by the end of 2015.  Mind you, you will be paying more for the products you purchase but getting less calories.  What a win-win sweetheart deal for the food industry.  You buy, but they don’t deliver the goods in the name of  “0″ calories.  The coalition, called the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation, includes major food makers like Campbell Soup, Coca-Cola, General Mills, Kellogg, Kraft Foods and PepsiCo. According to Jane Black’s article for the Washington Post online, the 16 companies in the coalition “make 20-25 percent of food consumed in the United States.”

Farming and Technology Merger?

Manure could fuel data centers, HP scientists say

Why can’t a farm just be a farm to grow food for the 99% of the population that is alienated from it’s agrarian roots?  Why is it necessary in sustainable agriculture to be a destination farm (the Farming Disneyland) or other alternative engagements?

May 19, 2010 By Brandon Bailey, San Jose Mercury News Enlarge

Giving new meaning to the term “server farm,” a team of Hewlett-Packard researchers has come up with a plan for combining cow chips and computer chips to build an environmentally friendly data center — powered by manure.

May 20, 2010 Posted Under Industry, Technology

UPDATE: On Flea Bites Causing Chronic Disease & Possible Human Birth Defects

Recalling the post a few days ago by a North Carolina report that flea bites are beginning to carry some of the “bugs” which ticks carry causing chronic diseases and possible human birth defects.  Well as the soap opera  Human Biological Experimentation Turns continues:

The good ol veterinary doctor, in perfect Plum Island Biological Warfare doctor model, it is now announced that Dr. Edward Breitschwerdt, who directs the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory (IPRL) in the Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, where he is a Professor of Medicine and Infectious Disease. He is also an Adjunct Professor of Medicine at Duke University Medical Center (Oh! Do we have a little cross-experimentation between animals & humans?) . Historically, research in the IPRL has focused on questions of comparative medical importance related to Rocky Mountain spotted fever (tick-carried), canine and human ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis, babesiosis and most recently bartonellosis in animal and human patients.

In addition the good ol doctor works in  collaboration with scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, University of Texas, Galveston, John’s Hopkins, University of California (Davis) and other research groups (‘other in legislative and regulatory language always means TROUBLE) around the world, Dr. Breitschwerdt and the laboratory has contributed to the development of more sensitive and specific diagnostic tests for a variety of insect-transmitted infectious agents. These diagnostic techniques can be used on numerous types of patient samples (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid or biopsy tissues) and are applicable to samples obtained from either sick animals or people. The laboratory performs applied research that has a direct impact on patient care and infectious disease management practices in both human and veterinary medicine.

From the trenches of liberty,

Celeste

May 20, 2010 Posted Under Health, Industry, Money Talks, One World, Technology, depopulation

Stamped USDA Approved: Veterinary Bailout

USDA accepting applications for loan repayment program

Remember when USDA Approved meant a good piece of meat?  Well if the shoe fits, wear it.

A federal notice was published April 30 inviting applications for the Department of Agriculture’s Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program, which will provide student loan debt relief for service in designated shortage areas across the United States.

May 20, 2010 Posted Under Industry, Money Talks, USDA

All the Government Reg’s & All the Goverments Enforcer’s: Can’t Make Your Food Safe Again

Food Safety: The Worst of Both Bills (HR 2749 & S 510)

BY PETE KENNEDY, ESQ.

File: 050610–Food_Safety_The_Worst.pdf

If S 510 (the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act) passes the Senate, there would be a conference committee between members of the House and Senate to draft a food safety bill that would combine provisions of S 510 and HR 2749 (the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009) into a final version of the bill. The full House and Senate each would vote on this version of the bill to determine whether the food safety bill becomes law.

S.510 and HR 2749 represent landmark legislation that will significantly increase the federal government’s power to regulate intrastate commerce while hurting this country’s ability to produce safe food and to become self-sufficient in food production.

Both bills take a one-size-fits-all approach towards food regulation, threatening to leave small farmers and local producers unable to afford the cost of complying with the legislation’s requirements. They would also significantly increase the power of the federal government to regulate intrastate commerce and give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) substantially greater power overall while making the agency less accountable for its actions.

In reality, neither bill would improve food safety; in fact, the new requirements would cause an increase in imported food, a major source of the food safety problems in this country. Either bill would diminish the freedom and liberty Americans currently have to obtain the food of their choice from the source of their choice. What follows is a review of the more damaging provisions of the two bills under the following subheadings:

A. National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy

B. Authority over Movement of Food

C. Criminal and Civil Penalties

D. HACCP Plans

E. Food Traceability

F. Safety Standards for Produce

ADHD Linked to Pesticide Exposure

Children exposed to higher levels of a type of pesticide found in trace amounts on commercially grown fruit and vegetables are more likely to have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder than children with less exposure, a nationwide study suggests.

May 19, 2010 Posted Under Food Fight, Health, Industry